Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Limitation period u/s 275(1)(a) ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Upheld: Assessing Officer's Order Within Section 275(1)(a) Time Limit.

September 19, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Limitation period u/s 275(1)(a) -hile deciding the question of limitation as mentioned in the section, penalty order passed by the AO was within the time-limit envisaged by the Act - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Limitation period u/s 275(1)(a) ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Upheld: Assessing Officer's Order Within Section 275(1)(a) Time Limit.

September 19, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income has not been made out against the assessee. - Though, similar disallowances were made by...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A/153C - The tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the...

Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - Income disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income which is not part of Regular Accounts - CIT(A) directed the AO that levy penalty...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Quick Updates: