Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2014 Year 2014 This

Levy of penalty @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded u/s ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

October 8, 2014

Levy of penalty @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded u/s 271(1)(c) – one family giving gift to another family year after year, it can be said to be against human probabilities, but that may not be sufficient to hold the assessee guilty of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

  2. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - this is not a fit case for levy of 300% penalty. Therefore, we direct the assessing officer to levy minimum penalty i.e. 100% of the...

  3. Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - suppression of turnover - penalty imposed at the minimum amount of 100% of the tax sought to be evaded - The penalty imposed for both...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - credit worthiness and genuineness of the transaction - Gifts by family friends – the explanation given by the assessee is totally false -...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is no ‘tax sought to be evaded’, in terms of Explanation 4 to section 271(1)(c), on which penalty could be levied - even as the asessee has...

  6. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - gift was received under bona fide belief that the same was a genuine gift - it was taxed during assessment proceedings but the penalty...

  7. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - in the present case the result of assessing the income either under the head ‘income from other sources’ or u/s.68 of the Act, the liability to...

  9. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Scope of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act cannot be widened later to include within its scope such additions which were not...

  10. Notice u/s 271AAB to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO gets the jurisdiction to levy the penalty by issuing a notice and therefore, it is not a procedural requirement but...

  11. Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) or penalty u/s.271AAA - The provisions of Section 271AAA(3) of the Act specifically excludes the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the...

  12. MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

  14. Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

  15. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates