Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - tribunal has materially erred ...

Tribunal Mistakenly Treated Protective Assessment Order as Substantive u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.

October 27, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - tribunal has materially erred in treating the assessment order as substantive assessment order without properly appreciating the order passed by the AO and it is to be held that the assessment order as such was a protective assessment order. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - tribunal has materially erred ...

Tribunal Mistakenly Treated Protective Assessment Order as Substantive u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.

October 27, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Having capitalized the amount of foreign exchange fluctuation in the relevant block of assets reveals its clear intent of treating it as capital...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - accrual of income for assessee society - In assessee`s appeal assessing officer treated contribution towards welfare Fund and Hospital Fund as...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Proposed amendment enables recovery of existing liabilities under Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 from seized assets...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act leviable without taking the approval from the Joint/Additional Commissioner of Income Tax,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

Quick Updates: