Addition of unexplained deposits u/s 68 - when the depositor is ...

Unexplained Deposits: Rs. 50,000 Confirmed, Rs. 50,000 Deemed Unexplained u/s 68 of Income Tax Act.

December 10, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition of unexplained deposits u/s 68 - when the depositor is confirming only ₹ 50,000/- out of ₹ 100,000/- shown by the assessee, it has to be accepted that balance deposit was not explained. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition of unexplained deposits u/s 68 - when the depositor is ...

Unexplained Deposits: Rs. 50,000 Confirmed, Rs. 50,000 Deemed Unexplained u/s 68 of Income Tax Act.

December 10, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The case involved legality of assessment u/s 153A without search or Panchnama. The search warrant named the assessee company, rejecting the objection. No incriminating...

Cash deposit of during demonetization period - total deposits made by the assessee to his bank account was below Rs.2,50,000/- - when the CBDT Circulars clearly provide,...

ITAT upheld addition under section 68 regarding unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 78,00,000/- as assessee failed to provide satisfactory explanation or supporting...

Additions u/s 68 - Unexplained Cash credit found in the bank account - The provisions of s. 68 & 69 use the word may indicating discretion conferred upon the AO by the...

Reopening of assessment beyond three years requires sanction from Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, whereas the assessee obtained sanction from Principal...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

In accordance with CBDT Instruction No. 3 of 2017, the AO exceeded jurisdiction by conducting inquiry into cash deposits up to Rs. 2.5 lakhs by an individual without...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/-...

The ITAT Bangalore, in a case involving unexplained money u/s. 69A, addressed deposits in a bank account during the demonetisation period. The DR argued that the...

Demand Interest u/s 201(1A) - Non deduction TDS u/s 194IA - As per the sale deed the details of the sellers / transferors of the said property and in fact the sellers...

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

The petitioner sought release of an export subsidy of Rs. 8,08,50,000/-. The respondent confirmed that the milk powder exported by the petitioner, amounting to 1617...

The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

Imported goods classification disputed - whether silver jewellery freely importable or restricted category under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Court found respondent's...

Quick Updates: