Penalty of ₹ 10,000 imposed on the adjudicating authority ...

Commissioner Fined Rs. 10,000 for Issuing Irresponsible Orders, Ignoring Tribunal Directions and Legal Provisions.

February 25, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Penalty of ₹ 10,000 imposed on the adjudicating authority / Commissioner for passing irresponsible adjudication orders defying the Tribunal's direction and ignoring the provisions of law - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty of ₹ 10,000 imposed on the adjudicating authority ...

Commissioner Fined Rs. 10,000 for Issuing Irresponsible Orders, Ignoring Tribunal Directions and Legal Provisions.

February 25, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

The CESTAT held that the imported betel nuts were rightly classified under CTH 0802 8030. While the minimum import price fixed by DGFT could not be treated as tariff...

The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine and penalty for importing old clothing. Referring to a previous case, it upheld confiscation due to non-compliance but decreased...

Levy of redemption fine and penalty - valuation of imported goods - brass scrap - The appellate tribunal noted the absence of a market survey conducted by the...

Petitioner pre-deposited Rs. 6,25,000/- as condition for filing appeal u/s 51 of TNVAT Act against Assessment Order dated 21.10.2010. After revised Assessment Order on...

The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and...

The High Court considered a case involving the release of seized goods u/s 110A. The issue was the non-issuance of a show cause notice within the stipulated time due to...

Importer imported footwear and evaded duty by deliberately claiming lesser IGST rate, violating N/N. 1/2017 which mandated mentioning sale price on footwear to claim...

Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent,...

CESTAT upheld confiscation of 1194 gold bangles (54096 gms valued at Rs.16,10,43,792/-) under Section 113(k) of Customs Act for diversion of export consignment. The...

The petitioner issued two post-dated cheques bearing No. 622623 for Rs. 93,00,000/- and No. 622624 for Rs. 1,54,00,000/- to the respondent as per a Deed of Undertaking....

Reduction of issued, subscribed, and paid-up equity share capital u/s 66 of the Companies Act, 2013. Compliance with Sections 66(1), 66(2), and 66(3) satisfied....

In a case involving the imposition of a redemption fine and penalty, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that when goods are allowed...

Quick Updates: