Product Development Expenditure disallowed - there is no ...

Tax Ruling: Product Development Costs Disallowed; No Distinction Between Capital and Revenue u/s 35(1) ITA.

March 17, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Product Development Expenditure disallowed - there is no distinction as to whether the expenditure incurred is capital or revenue, because while the provisions of section 35(1) of the Act allows deduction of revenue expenditure, the provisions of section 35(1)(iv) of the Act allows deduction in respect of capital expenditure - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Product Development Expenditure disallowed - there is no ...

Tax Ruling: Product Development Costs Disallowed; No Distinction Between Capital and Revenue u/s 35(1) ITA.

March 17, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT affirmed weighted deduction eligibility u/s 35(2AB) for in-house scientific research expenditure. While R&D expenses incurred within India qualify for weighted...

The assessee claimed weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) for donation made to M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust at the end of the year. The...

The Assessing Officer disallowed depreciation claimed on Plant & Machinery to the extent of the External Commercial Borrowing (ECB) amount waived off during the previous...

The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

The ITAT ruled that denial of weighted deduction under s.35(2AB) does not prevent the assessee from claiming normal deduction for R&D expenditure under s.35(1)(i)...

Income-tax (seventh Amendment) Rules, 2012 - Amends rule 12(1) - Notification

Disallowance of scientific Research and Development expenses - weighted deduction - Once the Revenue authorities accepted that the expenditure was incurred towards R&D...

Levy of penalty - taking CENVAT Credit irregularly - it is the contention of the Assessee that there is some element of discretion available in the adjudicating officer...

Deduction u/s 35(2AB) for in-house Research and Development (R&D) expenses was disallowed as the assessee failed to properly explain the basis of claim and reconcile the...

Weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) - bogus donations - the donors in connivance with various brokers, entry operators, donees etc. misued the benefit conferred u/s...

Deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) - Disallowance of donation made to School of Human Genetics & Population Health, Kolkata - The assessee would be eligible for benefit of weighted...

Deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) disallowed by AO based on Investigation Wing's report alleging bogus donations receipts issued by institutions. ITAT held AO did not make...

CIRP - The Kolkata Municipal Corporation who is owner of the premises by Development Agreement gave right of development of the premises to the Respondent No.1 and...

Central Government approves 'Advanced Manufacturing Technology Development Centre, Chennai' as an 'Other Institution' under 'University, College or Other Institution'...

Reopening of assessment - Disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 35(1)(ii) - The tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment, ruling it as a procedural irregularity...

Quick Updates: