Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be ...

Penalty Imposed Under RST Act, 1994 Section 78(5) Doesn't Require Proving Mens Rea for Section 78(2) Violations.

March 25, 2015

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be proved as necessary ingredient for imposition of penalty under sub-section (5) of Section 78, on proving violation of sub-section(2) of Section 78 of the RST Act, 1994 - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be ...

Penalty Imposed Under RST Act, 1994 Section 78(5) Doesn't Require Proving Mens Rea for Section 78(2) Violations.

March 25, 2015

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Claim of second sale exemption and the imposition of penalty u/s 12(5)(iii). The High Court held that when the burden was on the dealer to prove the factum of second...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

FEMA (Transfer or Issue Of Security By A Person Resident Outside India) - Sixth Amendment – Amendment In Regulations 2, 5, 10, 12 And Schedules 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7 - Notification

Income tax slabs - Upto 2 lacs = nil, from 2 lacs to 5 lacs = 10%, from 5 lacs to 10 lacs = 20%, above 10 lacs = 30%

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Penalty u/s 77(2) of the FA 1994 - delay in filing the service tax return - penalty of ₹ 20,000/- for each return - When the penalty has been imposed under Section...

Misdeclaration of imported polished marble slabs as unpolished slabs. Excess quantity found during physical verification. Customs duty demanded along with interest and...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

Recovery of penalty imposed on the respondent - Validity of insolvency notice issued to the respondent - interpretation of statute - words creditor, debt and debtor as...

Quick Updates: