Revision u/s 263 - CIT was not able to make up his mind and he ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 8, 2015

Revision u/s 263 - CIT was not able to make up his mind and he has remanded the matter back to the Assessing Authority to find out whether it constitutes capital gain or business income. Thus Commissioner had no justification to invoke Section 263 - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - CIT was not able to make up his mind and he ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 8, 2015

You may also like:

Validity of remanding the matter to the Assessing Authority - the first appellate authority has adjudicated the controversy on merits and therefore, the tribunal, which...

Power of commissioner (appeals) to remand back the case - There are no piece of evidence to take a contrary view to the finding of the first appellate authority as to...

Validity of assessment order u/s 144C - petitioner filed objection to the draft assessment order well within the time of thirty days before the DRP - The High Court held...

The HC held that considering the declaration issued by Indian Oil Corporation Limited stating they had discharged GST liability under RCM on services availed from the...

Confirmation of demand without issuance of Show Cause Notice - Matter remanded back to the adjudicating authority to decide the issue with an independent mind - HC

Power of Remand - The order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) remanding back the matter for fresh adjudication is set aside and the case is remanded back to the...

Validity of the order of ITAT - Matter remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer for reconsideration by Tribunal - Bogus LTCG - There was no material, which...

Revision of an order passed after remand back of the order by the Commissioner (appeal) to the adjudicating authority - action of revision is not correct as per law - AT

Imported flow meters, pressure transmitters, level transmitters, parts and accessories were classified under tariff headings 9032 8990 and 9032 9000 or 9026 of Customs...

Tribunal held Adjudicating Authority's order cryptic, failing to examine appellants' defense regarding legitimate procurement and supply of gold as business transaction....

Genuineness of the transaction going by the pay load of the vehicles, which was used for transporting the goods - It is found that the order passed by the appellate...

Whether in exercise of powers u/s 35C of the Act and while remanding the matter back to the original adjudicating authority, the Appellate Tribunal can issue direction...

Section 264 revision application concerning long-term capital gain (LTCG) on extinguishment of shares due to loss arising from NCLT order. Petitioner's claim for loss on...

The High Court found that the authorities had violated the principles of natural justice by cancelling the petitioner's registration without providing an opportunity for...

The appellate authority's order passed u/s 107 of the CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017 is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the appellate authority with a...

Quick Updates: