Marketability of product - mixture of graphite and clay - there ...

Court Finds Graphite-Clay Mixture Not Marketable Under Central Excise Regulations; Lacks Evidence of Marketability.

July 7, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Marketability of product - mixture of graphite and clay - there is no evidence whatsoever that the mixture of graphite and clay is at all marketable. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Marketability of product - mixture of graphite and clay - there ...

Court Finds Graphite-Clay Mixture Not Marketable Under Central Excise Regulations; Lacks Evidence of Marketability.

July 7, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The Calcutta High Court considered a case involving the clandestine removal of wire rods and the levy of a penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The...

Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal...

The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain...

The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

Penalty imposed by the Settlement Commission u/s 271(1)(c) - The petitioner argued against the penalty, citing lack of mens rea and the absence of evidence showing...

Undervaluation of imported goods - Patchouli Oil - The CESTAT found that the rejection of the declared value lacked legal basis and was unsupported by evidence. The...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

The Central Government rescinded Notification No. 10/2022-Central Excise and Notification No. 11/2022-Central Excise, both dated 30th June 2022, pertaining to the...

Interpretation and applicability of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of erroneously refunded excise duty. It discusses whether the...

Dishonour of Cheque - conviction of accused - The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act based on the evidence presented,...

Central Excise demands cannot be sustained solely based on confessional statements without corroborative documentary evidence. Retracted affidavits cannot be relied upon...

The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

The adjudicating authority classified the goods 'Bleach-9' manufactured by the assessee under chapter sub-heading 25.05, claiming NIL rate of duty, based on technical...

Quick Updates: