Fraudulent claim of undue DEPB benefits - adjudicating authority ...

Fraudulent DEPB Benefits Claim Remanded Due to Lack of Access to Overseas Inquiry Report by Adjudicating Authority.

July 25, 2015

Case Laws Customs AT

Fraudulent claim of undue DEPB benefits - adjudicating authority should have given copy of the overseas inquiry conducted by the department, if any, so that the appellant could have defended or put forth his views on the same - matter remanded back - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Fraudulent claim of undue DEPB benefits - adjudicating authority ...

Fraudulent DEPB Benefits Claim Remanded Due to Lack of Access to Overseas Inquiry Report by Adjudicating Authority.

July 25, 2015

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

ITAT partly allowed assessee's appeal. On revenue recognition issue, ITAT held AO made due enquiries, no lack of enquiry, decided in favour of assessee. On disallowance...

Income taxable in India - screening and investigation services provided by the assessee to its customers in India - Royalty or Fees for Technical Services (FTS) - The...

Refund of CVD and Special Additional Duty (SAD) - claim were rejected on the ground that DEPB scrips cannot be re- credited - After granting exemption subject to certain...

The assessee claimed exemption from long-term capital gains tax on the sale of agricultural land situated beyond the prescribed distance from municipal limits. The...

The case before CESTAT New Delhi involved fraudulent registration and utilization of duty-free scrips, leading to penalties. The appellant failed to comply with...

Customs broker's license suspension case involving violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Gross mis-declaration...

Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

Imported goods classified under incorrect tariff heading, appellants denied opportunity for cross-examination and access to test reports, violation of natural justice...

Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - CIT(A) sustained addition u/s 69A based on lack of supporting evidence for cash...

DEPB benefit - benefit obtained on the basis of forged documents - The liability of duty cannot be fastened on the appellant being a bona fide purchaser of DEPB scrips

Violation of principles of natural justice - Reliance on the Enquiry Reports - The court highlighted that the petitioner was given multiple opportunities to respond to...

Duty demand - Fraudulent DEPB Benefit availed by the seller of DEPB - DEPB scrips issued by DGFT is itself genuine, at the time of import and valid till it is set-aside...

Revision u/s 263 - When the order of the AO suffers from a complete lack of enquiry, then the above said principle has no application due to the obvious reason that the...

Quick Updates: