Misclassification due to suppression of facts – Imposition of ...

Court Overturns Settlement Commission Order on Misclassification Penalty Due to Inadequate Consideration of Fact Suppression Implications.

September 10, 2015

Case Laws Customs HC

Misclassification due to suppression of facts – Imposition of penalty – Settlement Commission ought to be aware of ramifications of imposing penalty – Commission failed to apply its mind to this important aspect of matter and court constrained to set aside order passed by Commission to this limited extent - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Misclassification due to suppression of facts – Imposition of ...

Court Overturns Settlement Commission Order on Misclassification Penalty Due to Inadequate Consideration of Fact Suppression Implications.

September 10, 2015

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

The High Court considered the legality of a penalty imposed u/s 31(3) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, due to the want of Form 28B. The issue was whether the defendants...

Settlement in a cheque dishonor case u/s 138 NI Act recorded by the court after satisfying its voluntariness is legally binding. Upon breach, the court must initiate...

Penalty imposed by the Settlement Commission u/s 271(1)(c) - The petitioner argued against the penalty, citing lack of mens rea and the absence of evidence showing...

Maintainability of appeals u/s 377 of CrPC against inadequate sentence was examined. Offences u/s 279-A of IT Act, 1961 are non-cognizable, triable by Magistrate....

The High Court rejected the petition challenging SEBI's decision to not accept the settlement applications. The petitioner's documents were deficient, and it failed to...

The Income Tax Settlement Commission passed an order charging interest u/ss 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income Tax Act. The petitioners challenged the order's...

Validity of Settlement Commission orders - The case involved petitions seeking directives for the issuance of formal orders under section 245D (4) of the Income Tax Act,...

The High Court held that while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, it does not assume the role of an appellate authority to conduct a merit...

Validity of Settlement Commission order - Settlement Commission passed an order to comply with the directions of the High Court to dispose of the application on or...

Settlement Commission lacks power to rectify order u/s 245F(1) by levying interest u/ss 234A, 234B, and 234C prior to 01.06.2011. Rectification order on 21.03.2003 was...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

The Karnataka High Court addressed the issue of a Sub-Registrar refusing registration of a sale certificate due to pending Income Tax dues against the borrowers. The...

The Rajasthan High Court considered a case involving the detention of goods due to an expired e-way bill, raising concerns about tax evasion. Citing a judgment from the...

Validity of order of Settlement Commission - acceptance of additional income disclosed by the assessee - Petitioner/Income Tax authority could not make out any...

The High Court held that the Interim Board for Settlement erred in rejecting the petitioner's settlement application for the relevant assessment years based on the...

Quick Updates: