Misclassification due to suppression of facts – Imposition of ...

Case Laws Customs

September 10, 2015

Misclassification due to suppression of facts – Imposition of penalty – Settlement Commission ought to be aware of ramifications of imposing penalty – Commission failed to apply its mind to this important aspect of matter and court constrained to set aside order passed by Commission to this limited extent - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Misclassification due to suppression of facts – Imposition of ...

Case Laws Customs

September 10, 2015

You may also like:

Power of settlement commission - Settlement Commission is within its powers to impose penalty on each of the Directors in addition to the imposition of penalty upon the...

Misclassification and Wrongful Claim of MEIS Benefits - Exports of quilts containing cotton/polyester - Levy of penalties - The CESTAT found the appellant guilty of...

Imposition of penalty - Advertisement Agency Service - non-payment of Service tax - Section 78 - when the first SCN was issued, the subsequent SCN cannot allege...

Benefit of reduced penalty of 15% u/s 28(5) - Delay in payment of penalty due to Public Holiday - The appellant voluntarily paid the differential BCD and interest upon...

Penalty - There was sufficient evidence to establish that the respondent is guilty of suppression of facts - The law laid u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 mandates imposition of...

It was open for the Settlement Commission to impose penalty on the directors in addition to imposing penalty on the company, if there was material justifying imposition...

Imposition of penalty u/r 15(2) of CCR, 2004 - CENVAT Credit - No evidence of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts which are essential conditions...

Quantum of penalty - suppression of taxable turnover - imposition of penalty at 200% was excessive and levy of penalty at 100% would meet the ends of justice.

Levy of Penalty - disallowance of CENVAT Credit - Only for the reason that VAL instead of contesting the show cause notice went for settlement before the Settlement...

Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

Penalty u/s 78 - suppression of facts - when mandatory penalty is imposable, whether the duty is paid before issue of show cause notice or after notice cannot alter the penalty.

Imposition of penalty - intention to evade service tax - it is found that the contention of the appellant that they bona fidely believed that they are not liable to pay...

Imposition of penalty - Except mere allegation of suppression, the Department did not bring any material on record to prove that there was suppression and concealment of...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Quick Updates: