Request for quashing of complaint - Section 9AA of the Central ...

Case Laws Central Excise

September 12, 2015

Request for quashing of complaint - Section 9AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - without impleading the partnership firm, prosecution initiated against the partners is not maintainable and on that ground, these petitions may be allowed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Request for quashing of complaint - Section 9AA of the Central ...

Case Laws Central Excise

September 12, 2015

You may also like:

Order quashing penalty levied u/s 130 of GST Act due to violation of principles of natural justice. Authority failed to address petitioner's request for personal hearing...

Seeking quashing FIR - foreign made liquor and beer - since the bonded warehouse was situated within the territorial jurisdiction of the Customs Department and the...

Dishonour of cheque - insufficient funds - vicarious liability of partners - The court concludes that the complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...

Denial of request for converting free shipping bill to DEPB shipping bill - The request by the appellant was to convert shipping bill from free to advance license...

GUIDELINES FOR CONVERSION OF COST ACCOUNTANTS FIRMS (PARTNERSHIP/PROPRIETARY) INTO LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIPS

Reopening proceedings against non-existent entity/ partnership firm -The case revolves around the jurisdictional issue arising from actions taken by the assessing...

Impleading of the Jurisdictional Commissioner as another respondent alongwith Commissioner (Adjudication) - The Tribunal examined Rule 12 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules,...

Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - non - impleading of the partnership firm as accused in the complaint case - it was imperative on the part of the...

The case involves a petition to quash proceedings u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to failure to implead the company as an accused. The petitioner, a...

Wrong availment of transitional Input Tax Credit - request for an adjournment was not responded to - The Court acknowledged that although a personal hearing was offered...

Offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act - it is very difficult for the Court to take a view that a partnership firm for the purpose of...

Deduction u/s 40(b)(v) - deduction of the amount of remuneration paid to the partners - the appellant has to be authorized by the partnership deed and the same has to be...

Status of the partnership firm treated as AOP - partnership deed is executed on an inadequate stamp paper - Department is accepting all the genuineness of existence of...

Benami transaction or not - The law recognises jointness only in the event of existence of a coparcenary and no coparcenary is pleaded. In relation to partnership also,...

Partnership firm - deduction u/s 40(b) - AO observed that partnership firms could not exist with artificial persons alone - there is nothing in that section to conclude...

Quick Updates: