Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2015 Year 2015 This

Denial of refund claim - the Commissioner has the power and ...


Commissioner Can Consider Refund Applications Within Two Years u/r 173L, Should Favor Assessee's Request.

September 17, 2015

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

Denial of refund claim - the Commissioner has the power and discretion under proviso (i) to Rule 173L to entertain an application within a total period of two years. This is a case where the Commissioner should have at least exercised the said discretion in favour of the assessee - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The petitioner filed a refund application within the two-year limitation period for the year 2017-2018 on 17.09.2018, and subsequently filed a fresh refund application...

  2. This order authorizes Income-tax authorities to admit applications or claims for refund and carry forward of loss u/s 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It...

  3. Refund of amount in question alleged to be forcibly recovered/collected through DRC-03 by the DGGI - requirement to make an application u/s 54 - The High court grants...

  4. Refund of accumulated input tax credit - relevant date for the purpose of considering the limitation u/s 54 - The High Court addressed this issue by directing the...

  5. Grant of interest in respect of the refund claim already granted - Revenue’s contention is that they have granted the refund within three months form the date of...

  6. Entitlement of Interest on delayed refund - relevant date for calculation of time - In the present case, refund arises only after passing of order-in-appeal by the...

  7. The appellant's Daman unit mistakenly paid duty liability of their Halol unit due to an error in the ERP system meant for all group units. The issue pertains to...

  8. Refund of service tax, interest on delayed sanction of refund, and time limitation u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, made applicable to service tax matters u/s 83...

  9. Assessee filed second rectification application u/s 254, raising same grounds as first miscellaneous application which was already rejected. Tribunal held that except...

  10. Rejection of the refund application - rejection on the ground of time limitation - Defective refund application - The High Court held that, even assuming that the...

  11. Refund of SAD - time limit of one year - the Commissioner(Appeals) has committed an error while giving an expanded interpretation qua limitation to favour assessee -...

  12. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - It is manifest that only suo-motu power of the Commissioner under Section 264 of the IT Act, is restricted against an order...

  13. Recovery of Refund - The original orders passed by the adjudicating authority in sanctioning the refunds in favour of the appellants were not challenged by Revenue...

  14. The High Court considered a case regarding refund of Input Tax Credit. The petitioner's refund application was rejected due to lack of supporting documents. The...

  15. Refund with interest - statutory period of 60 days for processing the refund claim - The court referenced Section 54(7) of the CGST Act, which requires the proper...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates