Clandestine removal of goods - only basis for the demand of duty ...

Matter Remanded for Further Review Due to Lack of Consideration of Seized Documents in Duty Demand Case Based on Electricity Use.

October 29, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal of goods - only basis for the demand of duty is electricity consumption but no comments have been made by the adjudicating authority to demand on the basis of documents seized during the course of investigation - Matter remanded back - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal of goods - only basis for the demand of duty ...

Matter Remanded for Further Review Due to Lack of Consideration of Seized Documents in Duty Demand Case Based on Electricity Use.

October 29, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Customs duty concession case remanded due to violation of principles of natural justice by not providing relied upon documents. Department denied copies of investigation...

Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

The case pertains to the determination of whether the process undertaken by the appellant, a job worker, amounts to manufacture and the consequent duty liability. It was...

Search and seizure operations conducted by respondent No. 3 on petitioner-Company's sister entity premises, seizing material like sales registers, accounts books, and...

Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of proper communication regarding show cause notice and order, leading to tax demand confirmation without petitioner's...

Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

Duty demand - FOC kits sold along with JCBs machines - The dropping of similar show cause notices relating to similar demands for duty has led to an anomalous situation...

Proceeds of crime money laundering case. Respondent Enforcement Directorate permitted to retain/seize/freeze seized documents, digital records, bank accounts from...

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Rejection of objection put by Assessee - Assessing Officer instead of providing these documents simply dismissed petitioner’s request...

Scope of SCN - Presumption with regards to documents seized - In view of Section 36A of Central Excise Act, 1944 it is only when such document is tendered in evidence...

Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of jurisdiction and non-application of mind. Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) liability issue: Petitioner's reply on...

Provisional attachment of Bank Accounts - lack of application of mind - In the event, the Commissioner refuses to lift the orders of provisional attachment once again,...

Assessment passed u/s.153A - Presumption in case of seized documents - Assessee’s son was also covered under the search in the same premises and the document found from...

Duty demand of Rs.15,19,610/- confirmed. Original demand of Rs.2,54,01,776/- not accepted. Appellant failed to counter Commissioner's observations on Annexures II, III,...

Quick Updates: