Penalty u/s.271(1)(C) - paints were his “personal effects” - the ...

Tax Authorities Accept Explanation: No Penalty Imposed for Painting Sales u/s 271(1)(C) Due to Honest Belief.

December 1, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s.271(1)(C) - paints were his “personal effects” - the plea of the assessee that receipts from sale of paintings were not offered to tax on a bona fide belief is acceptable. - as there was neither concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, no penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s.271(1)(C) - paints were his “personal effects” - the ...

Tax Authorities Accept Explanation: No Penalty Imposed for Painting Sales u/s 271(1)(C) Due to Honest Belief.

December 1, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the matter travelled to the Tribunal, the explanation which was given by the assessee and accepted by the CIT(A) was once again examined by...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee company had been assessed to tax under the deeming provisions of Sec. 115JB of the Act, therefore, on the basis of our...

Quick Updates: