Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2016 Year 2016 This

Imposition of penalties for the period 2007-08 to 2010-11 - ...

Case Laws     Service Tax

March 21, 2016

Imposition of penalties for the period 2007-08 to 2010-11 - Sections 76 & 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - if the show cause notices are issued after the date of amendment, penalties under Section 76 and 78 simultaneously cannot be imposed and hence setting aside the penalty under Section 76 is uninterferable - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Waiver of penalty u/s 78 was allowed but waiver of penalty u/s 76 was refused by the tribunal - once the assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for the failure....

  2. Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

  3. Levy of penalty - There are no reason why the said benefit cannot be extended to the penalty imposed under Section 76, since both the Sections are to be read along with...

  4. Penalty imposed u/s 76, 77 & 78 - renting of immovable property - case is squarely covered for non imposition of penalties under Section 80A - AT

  5. Penalties under both Sections 76 and 78 were imposable simultaneously on the respondents for failure to pay service tax for the period prior to 10.05.2008 although show...

  6. Penalty under Section 76 and 78 simultaneously -show cause notice is issued to the appellant on 18.6.2008 and whereas the amendment to Section 78 was carried out on...

  7. Levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78 - waiver u/s 80 - delay in payment of service tax - penalty imposed on the Respondents under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, is to be...

  8. Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, cannot be imposed simultaneously with penalty u/s 76 for the same offense. The decision in Nizam Sugar Factory case applies to...

  9. Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, penalties imposed under Section 78 cannot be justified, Hence the penalties imposed u/s 78 is set aside - In the...

  10. Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - provisions of Section 78 having been invoked and penalty imposed, Section 76 penalty may not be justified - AT

  11. Waiver of penalty is pleaded as the penalty under Section 78 ibid has been imposed and for an option to pay 25% (reduced) mandatory penalty under Section 78 ibid as the...

  12. Inasmuch as a penalty under Section 78 is being sustained, there is no justification for restoring the penalty under Section 76 as sought for by the department. However,...

  13. Penalty u/s 76 and 78 of FA - continuous default in paying service tax - statute has provided for cases/situations where there is a possibility of payment of Service Tax....

  14. Penalty u/s 76, 77 & 78 - Payment of service tax before issuance of SCN - provisions of sub-section (3) of Section 73 is clearly attracted in the facts of the case and...

  15. Penalty u/s 78 - Simultaneous penalty u/s 76 and 78 - penalties u/s. 76 and 78 of the Finance Act are simultaneously imposable upon a assessee for the period prior to 10....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates