Imposition of penalties for the period 2007-08 to 2010-11 - ...

Simultaneous Penalties u/ss 76 & 78 of Finance Act 1994 Not Allowed Post-Amendment; Section 76 Penalty Dropped.

March 21, 2016

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Imposition of penalties for the period 2007-08 to 2010-11 - Sections 76 & 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - if the show cause notices are issued after the date of amendment, penalties under Section 76 and 78 simultaneously cannot be imposed and hence setting aside the penalty under Section 76 is uninterferable - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalties for the period 2007-08 to 2010-11 - ...

Simultaneous Penalties u/ss 76 & 78 of Finance Act 1994 Not Allowed Post-Amendment; Section 76 Penalty Dropped.

March 21, 2016

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Simultaneous penalty u/s 76 and 78 - proviso to Section 78 made it explicit which was till then implicit - simultaneous penalty under section 76 and 78 of the Finance...

Penalty u/s 78 - Simultaneous penalty u/s 76 and 78 - penalties u/s. 76 and 78 of the Finance Act are simultaneously imposable upon a assessee for the period prior to 10....

Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, cannot be imposed simultaneously with penalty u/s 76 for the same offense. The decision in Nizam Sugar Factory case applies to...

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - waiver of penalty u/s 80 - C&F Service - inclusion of reimbursements of expenses - there were divergent views on the issue - penalty waived - AT

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Waiver of penalty u/s 78 was allowed but waiver of penalty u/s 76 was refused by the tribunal - once the assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for the failure....

Waiver of penalty is pleaded as the penalty under Section 78 ibid has been imposed and for an option to pay 25% (reduced) mandatory penalty under Section 78 ibid as the...

Levy of penalty - There are no reason why the said benefit cannot be extended to the penalty imposed under Section 76, since both the Sections are to be read along with...

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - provisions of Section 78 having been invoked and penalty imposed, Section 76 penalty may not be justified - AT

Penalty u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - No malafide can be attributed to the respondent, who is organized under Government of India - No penalty.

Levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - taxability of Sale of Space or Time for Advertisement - it is a case of bonafide mistake - no penalty - AT

Penalty - ignorance of law - misguidance by the Consultant - ignorance of law is enough to set-aside penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - AT

Penalty imposed u/s 76, 77 & 78 - renting of immovable property - case is squarely covered for non imposition of penalties under Section 80A - AT

Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, penalties imposed under Section 78 cannot be justified, Hence the penalties imposed u/s 78 is set aside - In the...

Quick Updates: