Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2016 Year 2016 This

Remission of Central Excise duty - they had not given any ...


Failure to Notify Destruction of Goods Leads to Duty Demand Confirmation for Excise Violation.

March 23, 2016

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Remission of Central Excise duty - they had not given any specific intimation to the Dept. the time and date of the proposed destruction. Removal of goods from Bonded Store Room without permission, and destruction of same in the absence of supervision/permission are clearly not in accordance with the provisions. - Demand confirmed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Duty demand - collection excess duty from customers on sale of import goods - duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act cannot be demanded on imported custom...

  2. Duty demand - Shortage of stock - Clandestine removal of goods - information received from the Income tax Department cannot be made the sole basis for confirmation of...

  3. This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

  4. Short payment of Central Excise Duty - The Appellate Tribunal concluded that central excise duty is leviable only on excisable goods manufactured or produced in India,...

  5. Eligibility for Abatement of duty - Notified Goods - Compounded levy scheme - The revenue has demanded duty for days for which the machine was not in operation - In the...

  6. Clandestine Removal - Grey Fabrics - It is also found that on the one hand the Revenue has made demand of central excise duty on goods consumed in the finished goods and...

  7. 100% EOU - Import of textile machinery without payment of duty - Failure to install the capital goods within stipulated time - since the impugned goods have been...

  8. Appellate Tribunal set aside orders denying remission of excise duty on indigenous goods and customs duty on imported goods destroyed in factory fire. Tribunal found no...

  9. The appellant paid excise duty on the removal of inputs as such, based on the transaction value. However, this excise duty was found to be in excess of the actual CENVAT...

  10. The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported goods and stored them in a licensed warehouse u/s 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. These goods were destroyed in a...

  11. The dispute pertained to the excise duty payable on certain goods, with the petitioner and the excise department adopting different classifications. The key issues were...

  12. Goods manufactured within Special Economic Zone (SEZ) were challenged regarding applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) and Additional Duty of Excise...

  13. Demand of differential Central Excise Duty with interest and penalty - inflating freight charges through their dummy transport unit - The Tribunal affirmed the...

  14. The case involved a dispute regarding the valuation of goods for central excise duty purposes. The Appellate Tribunal held that the price declared by the appellant for...

  15. Levy of Central Excise duty - intermediate goods used in the manufacture of exempt final goods - the duty liability would fall on the manufacturer who is a job worker in...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates