Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2016 Year 2016 This

Period of limitation - Invokation of Section 61(1) of the Bombay ...


Court Cannot Override Limitation Period u/s 61(1) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959: Mandatory Compliance Required.

April 9, 2016

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Period of limitation - Invokation of Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - an order of court cannot override the legal provision which is specific in nature - period of limitation statutorily prescribed cannot be waived - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. NCLAT addressed the computation of limitation periods for filing appeals under IBC. The tribunal held that while the 30-day limitation period under Section 61 can be...

  2. Maintainability of appeal filed belatedly - the scheme of limitation for filing Appeal as delineated by Section 61 does not give any scope to the submission that...

  3. The High Court held that the proceedings initiated u/s 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 were vitiated as the Proper Officer had previously dropped the proceedings u/s 61(2)...

  4. The order addresses the computation of the limitation period for filing an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal u/s 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The...

  5. Validity of order passed u/s 201(1)/201(1A) - Period of limitation - prior to section 201 was amended by Finance Act No.2 of 2009, no time limit was provided for passing...

  6. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

  7. Defect in the appeal - Condonation of delay - The limitation prescribed in filing an appeal under Section 61 of the Code or Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013 shall...

  8. HC held reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid due to statutory limitation u/s 149. The original notice was set aside for lacking mandatory approvals...

  9. Demand u/s 201(1) - assessee in default - Period of limitation - the limitation prescribed for passing orders under Section 201(1) of the Act deeming a person to be an...

  10. Statutory provisions regarding restoration of a company's name on the Register of Companies maintained by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) u/s 252(1) and 252(3) of the...

  11. Delay in Revival of the Corporate Debtor - This Tribunal, on going through the words, any person Aggrieved, occurring in Section 61 (1) of the I & B Code, 2016, is of...

  12. The Bombay High Court addressed non-compliance with Rule 28 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 regarding timely registration and disposal of applications u/s 94 and 95 of the...

  13. Refund of Additional Duty of Customs paid - to allow the limitation period to start from the date of payment of duty as prescribed under the amended notification, would...

  14. HC determined that invoking extended limitation period under First Proviso to Section 73(1) of Finance Act 1994 was unjustified. Following P&B Pharmaceuticals and...

  15. The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of appeal against cancellation of GST registration for non-compliance with GST REG 2017. The petitioner...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates