Home Highlights May 2016 Year 2016 This

You may also like:

1. CENVAT Credit - invoices issued without actual supply of materials - retraction of statements - burden of proof - personal penalty on partner of appellant firm....

2. Jurisdiction to issue show cause notice (SCN), authority adjudicating the matter despite being different from the issuing authority, admissibility of CENVAT credit based...

3. Cenvat credit for service tax paid on 'management fee' and 'common sharing of Head office services' - invoices from the service provider were not in the prescribed...

4. CENVAT Credit - denial of Cenvat Credit on the ground that the appellant have taken the Cenvat Credit suo-moto as they have also filed the refund claim - The appellant...

5. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of CENVAT Credit for insurance services and air travel agency services u/s Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It was...

6. CENVAT Credit - Bogus firms - fraudulent Cenvat Credit passing chain to facilitate availment of Cenvat Credit without actual manufacture and supply of duty paid goods -...

7. Cenvat Credit - Forged DEPB Scrips - burden of proof regarding the admissibility of the Cenvat credit shall lie upon the manufacture taking such credit - credit to be...

8. CENVAT Credit - input service availed by the appellant at the depot level - The case involved the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for clearing and...

9. Refund of pre-deposit - ITAT on 21.10.2014 passed remand order - the authorities were required to pass fresh assessment by 31.03.2017 - But, order was not passed by that...

10. Right to information - The law does not contemplate filing of two First Appeals before two different FAAs. Hence, the passing of two different orders by two different...

11. Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

12. CENVAT Credit - duty paying invoices (document) - cenvat credit availed on the strength of railway receit - Rule 9 is subservient to Rule 3 for determining the...

13. Assessee filed second rectification application u/s 254, raising same grounds as first miscellaneous application which was already rejected. Tribunal held that except...

14. CENVAT credit - duty paying documents - mention of incorrect vehicle no. has little effect regarding admissibility of CENVAT credit, and such error may be treated as the...

15. CENVAT Credit - input services - The Department did not file any appeal against this order dated 17.11.2017 of the Tribunal and so the order passed by the Tribunal...