The case is established against the appellants at least on the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 2, 2016

The case is established against the appellants at least on the yardstick of preponderance probability. Revenue is not required to prove its case with mathematical precision specially in cases involving deliberate and well-thought out modus operandi to evade duty. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case is established against the appellants at least on the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 2, 2016

You may also like:

Dishonor of Cheque - rebuttal of presumption - preponderance of probabilities - There is no evidence to establish that the appellant had informed the Bank about the loss...

Dishonor of Cheque - insufficient fund - preponderance of probabilities - In view of such statements made by the complainant at the time of her cross-examination, there...

Clandestine Removal - reliability of statements - sufficiency of evidence or not - In a serious case such as evasion of duty by fraud, the degree of appreciation of...

Duty demand - Clandestine removal - Revenue has prima facie proved preponderance of probability is in their favour and it is a fit case where some pre-deposit has to be...

Dishonour of cheque - insufficient funds - presumption - standard of preponderance of probabilities - reasons to believe. Earlier, dishonour of cheque was dealt through...

Appellant proved ownership of gold bars through valid invoices, discharging initial onus. Revenue failed to establish invoices unrelated to seized gold, lacking inquiry...

Dishonor of Cheque - Prosecution must prove the guilt of an accused beyond all reasonable doubt. The standard of proof so as to prove a defence on the part of an accused...

Multiple trades on the same day - fraudulent and unfair trade - Even though preponderance of probability is sufficient to prove PFUTP violations still fraudulent and...

Dishonour of Cheque - existence of legally recoverable debt or liability - The accused has failed to establish his defence even on preponderance of probability,...

Clandestine Removal - Levy of penalty - If on the basis of the evidences adduced which would be of the nature as enumerated at (ii) of para 40 of the said decision, the...

Clandestine removal - Preponderance of probability is in favor of Revenue when appellants failed to come out with clean hands. Although appellant tried that...

Dishonor of Cheque - The presumption under Section 139 is a rebuttable presumption and the onus is on the accused to raise the probable defence. The standard of proof...

Claim of Liquidated damages - ascertained liability - Admittedly, in the instant case, no such past events have been placed before the Assessing Officer to show that...

The allegation of clandestine removal has been established by the Revenue against the appellant. While the onus is on the Revenue to establish clandestine removal, they...

Clandestine removal - when such evil activities are done in utter secrecy and in an organized manner, there would be only very few evidences available; therefore,...

Quick Updates: