Refund claim - Period of limitation - claim was filed on ...

Refund Claim Allowed After Valuation Investigation; Unjust Enrichment Provision Not Applicable Due to Deposit Timing.

June 3, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund claim - Period of limitation - claim was filed on 29.07.2004 which was returned on the ground of pre-mature inasmuch as investigation about the valuation work was still going on, accordingly, appellant resubmitted their claim on 28.10.2005 - refund allowed - Provision of unjust enrichment not applicable where the amount is deposited during the investigation - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - Period of limitation - claim was filed on ...

Refund Claim Allowed After Valuation Investigation; Unjust Enrichment Provision Not Applicable Due to Deposit Timing.

June 3, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - amount deposited during investigation - and amount of pre-deposit - Refund allowed - AT

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Tribunal on merit of claim held that no service tax is payable - the adjudicating authority did sanction the refund but...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Appellant has claimed the deduction of the amount claimed as refund by them as expense in his profit and loss account, i.e. as a...

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Refund claim - finalization of provisional assessment - unjust enrichment - captive consumption - even in respect of captive consumption, unjust enrichment provision is...

Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment - There is no provision in the Central Excise law that the state government authorities would be are outside of the principles...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - When the provisions of Central Excise are not applicable in that case bar of unjust enrichment is also not applicable - AT

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Quick Updates: