Pure agent - reimbursement of expenses - appellant has not ...

Appellant Fails to Qualify as Pure Agent u/r 5 of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006.

June 8, 2016

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Pure agent - reimbursement of expenses - appellant has not satisfied the conditions prescribed in Rule 5 of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 to satisfy the criteria for a pure agent. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Pure agent - reimbursement of expenses - appellant has not ...

Appellant Fails to Qualify as Pure Agent u/r 5 of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006.

June 8, 2016

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

The appellants, acting as clearing and forwarding agents, recovered certain reimbursement expenditures incurred for transporting goods on behalf of their principals....

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning service tax on payments made by appellant to overseas logistics agents. Tribunal held that pre-April 2006 demand of Rs. 11,97,047 was...

Demand of differential service tax - Valuation - non-inclusion on reimbursable expenses - pure agent services - The Appellate Tribunal analyzed the agreements and legal...

Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67...

The CESTAT held that the advertisement charges collected by the appellant as reimbursement expense cannot be included in the gross value of franchise service. The...

Highlights of Amendments in Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 - Article

Levy of service tax - pure agent services or not - implementation of the Information Technology related projects - The appellant was appointed merely as a Nodal Agency...

CESTAT determined reimbursed expenses received by a Customs House Agent (CHA) from clients are not includible in the taxable value for service tax assessment. Following...

Classification of service - Pure agent or service provider - The applicant does not satisfy any one of the conditions mentioned in the Rule 33 of CGST Rules, 2017 which...

Works Contract Service - original works - service tax liability @40% or otherwise - There is failure on the part of learned Commissioner to allow the admissible...

The CESTAT ruled that the amount paid by the appellant towards advertisement and promotion of its own franchise outlets cannot be included in the value of taxable...

The CESTAT held that service tax cannot be levied on the value of goods sold during execution of a works contract. The taxable value is the value of services rendered,...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Whether the assessee is correct in discharging service tax on gross amount charged under Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 after availing CENVAT credit on inputs or...

Levy of service tax on reimbursement amounts based on Rule 5(1) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, and whether the reimbursement amount can be...

Quick Updates: