Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2016 Year 2016 This

Tribunal discretion to refusal of to admit the appeal - appeal ...


Tribunal Dismisses Appeal Due to Amount Below Rs. 50,000 Threshold, Ignoring Case Merits.

June 17, 2016

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Tribunal discretion to refusal of to admit the appeal - appeal is dismissed only on the ground that amount is below threshold limit of ₹ 50,000/- without going into merit of the case. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Demand Interest u/s 201(1A) - Non deduction TDS u/s 194IA - As per the sale deed the details of the sellers / transferors of the said property and in fact the sellers...

  2. HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/-...

  3. Reopening of assessment beyond three years requires sanction from Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, whereas the assessee obtained sanction from Principal...

  4. The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

  5. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of assessment u/s 148A of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer had alleged...

  6. The petitioner sought release of an export subsidy of Rs. 8,08,50,000/-. The respondent confirmed that the milk powder exported by the petitioner, amounting to 1617...

  7. The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

  8. When assessee allotted plot by Noida Authorities, entered agreement to sell on 07.02.2003 receiving Rs. 4,50,000/-, remaining Rs. 4,76,000/- paid to Noida Authorities as...

  9. In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

  10. Levy of redemption fine and penalty - valuation of imported goods - brass scrap - The appellate tribunal noted the absence of a market survey conducted by the...

  11. The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

  12. The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

  13. Imported goods classification disputed - whether silver jewellery freely importable or restricted category under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Court found respondent's...

  14. Benefit of abatement of 67% denied - while reducing the amount of pre-deposit to Rs.19,50,000/-, which is approximately 50% of the total amount due, and therefore, such...

  15. CESTAT upheld the demand for differential duty on imported betel nuts from Indonesia, rejecting the appellant's objection regarding time limitation. The Tribunal...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates