Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - ALP determination - an honest difference ...

No Penalty for Honest Disagreement on Arm's Length Price u/s 271(1)(c) Between Taxpayer and Revenue.

June 17, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - ALP determination - an honest difference of opinion between the assessee and the Revenue can never be a cause for imposition of penalty. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - ALP determination - an honest difference ...

No Penalty for Honest Disagreement on Arm's Length Price u/s 271(1)(c) Between Taxpayer and Revenue.

June 17, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The case pertains to the levy of penalty u/s 271G for failure to furnish documents and information u/ss 92CA/92D. The key points are: The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Transfer pricing adjustment - assessee advanced interest free loan to its AE - The Tribunal noted that the assessee had disclosed all...

If the Transfer Pricing Officer did not agree to the arm's length price shown by the assessee it was open for him to determine the arm's length price by applying one of...

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

TPA - where the variation between the arm’s length price determined u/s 92C and the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

The ITAT ruled that penalties under sections 271(1)(c) and 270A against the taxpayer were improper and directed their deletion. The tribunal held that merely making an...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition on account of Transfer Pricing adjustment relating to payment of commission - it is evident that these are debatable issues - In any...

Defective notice issued u/s 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) for levying penalty. The key points are: The phrases "conceal" and "furnishing of inaccurate particulars" in...

Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - mere treatment of an amount as revenue (by the AO) instead of capital (by the taxpayer) - The rejection of such a claim by the Appellate...

Penalty u/s 271AAA or 271(1)(c) - The penalties u/s 271(1)(c) and 271AAA are attracted in different situations and both are mutually exclusive. Having initiated the...

Quick Updates: