Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2016 Year 2016 This

Exemption u/s 54F - Once it is demonstrated that the ...


High Court: Section 54F Income Tax Exemption Valid if Investment Intention in Residential Property is Demonstrated, Despite Incomplete Transactions.

June 18, 2016

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Exemption u/s 54F - Once it is demonstrated that the consideration received on transfer has been invested either in purchasing a residential house or in construction of a residential house even though the transactions are not complete in all respects and as requited under the law, that would not disentitle the assessee from the said benefit - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Charitable institution invested funds in shares of joint venture companies, violating Section 13(1)(d). Exemption u/s 11 denied for income from such investment. However,...

  2. Correct head of income - transactions of dealing in shares - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)'s decision regarding two key issues....

  3. Correct head of income - treatment of income from sale and purchase of shares - business income or income from capital gains - high volume of transactions and frequently...

  4. Applicability of Section 64(1) and Section 54F of the Income Tax Act. Section 64(1) allows for the inclusion of a dependent spouse's income in the assessee's taxable...

  5. In the ITAT Delhi case, the issue revolved around claiming exemption u/s 54F for investment in a residential house. The CIT(A) allowed the exemption based on the...

  6. The High Court held that the phrase 'a residential house' in Section 54F of the Income Tax Act should be interpreted strictly to mean a single residential unit. The...

  7. Service tax on immovable property has been held as constitutionally valid – Bombay High Court

  8. Service tax on immovable property has been held as constitutionally valid – Bombay High Court

  9. Exemption u/s 54F - LTCG - investment made in the house property in USA - the investment in a residential house was made in USA prior to 01.04.2015, whereas, the...

  10. The assessee claimed exemption/deduction u/s 54F on account of investing long-term capital gains in a new residential house. The PCIT disallowed the claim, considering...

  11. Disallowance u/s 14A - Exempted income - proportionate disallowance of interest paid by the banks for investments made in tax free bonds/ securities which yield tax free...

  12. The assessee had been following the mercantile system of accounting, wherein book profits are taken for tax assessment, though credit or debit amounts may not be...

  13. Disallowance of exemption claimed u/s 54EC - non filling ROI - investment made in REC - assessee has neither filed return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act, nor in...

  14. Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - residential status of the assessee under the India-USA DTAA. Assessee stayed in India for more than 183 days, considered a...

  15. The High Court addressed the issue of exemption u/s 10(25)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer denied the exemption to the assessee fund, claiming it lost...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates