Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2016 Year 2016 This

Works Contracts - benefit of compounding of tax - suppressed ...


Petitioner Denied Compounding Tax Benefits Due to Failure to Apply; Department's Action Deemed Justified.

June 21, 2016

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Works Contracts - benefit of compounding of tax - suppressed contract receipt - no compounding application was ever filed - Department was justified in acting accordingly as if petitioner had not opted for payment of tax at compounded rate. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - failure to file Periodic/GST Return - The petitioner, a Goldsmith registered under the Uttarakhand Goods and Services...

  2. Refund of amount deposited under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - refund sought on the premise that the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the...

  3. Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

  4. Recovery of sales tax dues - encumbered property or not - liability of auction purchasers - this is a clear case in which the Sales Tax Department had a charge on the...

  5. Benefit of compounding system of assessment - There being no provision to deny the benefit of section 3(4) of the Act, on the mere ground of the petitioner's inter-State...

  6. The High Court directed the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to amend the shipping bills u/s 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, and process the claim for the...

  7. The HC held that the appellant could not be treated as permitted to pay tax on compounded basis u/s 7 of KGST Act. Despite applying for compounded tax, there was no...

  8. The High Court set aside the final assessment order and demand notice issued by the Income Tax department. The petitioner had filed an application u/s 35-A of the Income...

  9. Appellant's conduct showed mentality of evading taxes, not cooperating from filing return till assessment. Though penalty order was in 2002, appellant did not file...

  10. Refund of service tax - Export of goods - allegation of illicit mining - Levy of tax on illegal activities / illegal export. - unless there is any provision to the...

  11. Department failed to take action in time, no ground to deny the due benefit to claimant - SC

  12. The petitioner's denial of refund of input tax credit debited as a pre-deposit was challenged. The court held that the non-inclusion of freight and pumping charges...

  13. Priority of secured creditors under the SARFAESI Act over claims by the Income Tax Department. The respondent mortgaged the property to the petitioner in 2013-14, prior...

  14. Refund of amount deducted from the petitioner account due to garnishee proceedings - the action of the Department is illegal, arbitrary and totally unauthorized in the...

  15. The court held that the petitioner-bank's registered security interest with CERSAI, dated 17th March 2017, has priority over the dues claimed by the GST and Sales Tax...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates