Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2016 Year 2016 This

Levy of Penalty - manual filing of returns - department has been ...


Department's Penalty Notice for Manual Returns Deemed Improper After 5 Years of Acceptance Without Objection.

July 2, 2016

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Levy of Penalty - manual filing of returns - department has been accepting their manual returns and after 5 years, issued notice for imposing penalties for not filing returns by electronic mode, is improper and incorrect - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Re-assessment - Time limitation for notices issued - period of limitation enhanced from 5 years to 6 years - Prospective or retrospective amendment - 5 year period...

  2. Guidelines for manual selection of returns for Complete Scrutiny during the financial-year 2019-20

  3. Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

  4. Dishonour of Cheque - insufficient funds - notice not served upon to the applicants / Directors of the company - Deemed service of notice - in spite of the notices...

  5. Validity of revised return 139(5) - Revised return did not conform to the prescription of section 139(5), before its substitution w.e.f. A.Y. 2017-18, which provided for...

  6. The Income Tax Act did not intend to tax deemed rental income from properties held as stock-in-trade prior to the assessment year 2018-19. Section 23(5), introduced from...

  7. Penalty u/s.271AAB - Belated filing of regular return after search - Penalty cannot be levied u/s.271AAB of the Act, in respect of income disclosed in regular return of...

  8. Scope of section 80A(5) - Revised return was not permissible and revised return of revised return is not thought of by the legislature. Thus, u/s 139(5) once return is...

  9. Petitioner cannot evade penalty u/s 22(5) of TNVAT Act, 2006 by paying tax after inspection but before assessment order. Rule 7(9) of TNVAT Rules, 2007 prohibits filing...

  10. Tax deducted at source (TDS) credit was denied in the intimation u/s 143(1) to the assessee. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the Centralized Processing...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - revised returns were not valid returns u/s 139(5) and that, such returns were not voluntarily filed rather the same were filed only after...

  12. Deemed dividend u/s. 2(22)(e) - the loan given by the company only in the immediate preceding year, i.e., assessment year 2007-08, should be assessed as deemed dividend...

  13. HC ruled on belated assessment orders under Entry Tax Act 2001 for AY 2003-04 and 2004-05. Though no explicit limitation period exists, assessments must be completed...

  14. Revised return filed after expiry of one year - voluntary revised return u/s 139(5) or return filed in pursuance of notice u/s 148 - Revised return after approval of...

  15. Issuance of C-form - The petitioner cannot seek a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to issue the ‘C’ Form for the Financial Year 2012-13 after over four years, when the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates