It cannot be the case that if one person could not be caught ...

Court Confirms: One Lawbreaker Avoiding Detection Doesn't Justify Others Doing the Same; Evidence from Seized Documents Validated.

July 8, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

It cannot be the case that if one person could not be caught while infringing the law then, other one has also right to infringe or to break the law. - Addition on the basis of noting found in the seized paper confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

It cannot be the case that if one person could not be caught ...

Court Confirms: One Lawbreaker Avoiding Detection Doesn't Justify Others Doing the Same; Evidence from Seized Documents Validated.

July 8, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Corruption and money laundering - HC has quashed the FIR - Viewed through the prism of gravity of allegations, a first information report based on "probability" of a...

Penalty u/s 18(1)(c) of the W.T. Act - the filing of the return was not a voluntary one but after detection by the department. In none of those cases there was detection...

Applicability of doctrine of finality and res-judicata - The High Court held that, the principles of res-judicata do not apply squarely for one assessment year to the...

Situation arising out of lockdown ordered as a precaution for prevention of Coronavirus spread - extension of dates of courts to approach the courts of law - All interim...

This legal case pertains to the dishonor of a cheque and the presumption of innocence. The High Court held that the First Appellate Court erred in acquitting the accused...

Refund of accumulated balance of credit on education cess and secondary and higher education cess - credit could not be utilised prior to GST regime - It is, therefore,...

The High Court's decision centers around the interpretation of Section 83 of the CGST/SGST Acts, which deals with provisional attachment orders. The key points are:...

This case deals with the levy of deficit stamp duty and penalty in a court-conducted auction sale. The key points are: In a court-supervised auction sale, the stamp...

The High Court considered the legality of a penalty imposed u/s 31(3) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, due to the want of Form 28B. The issue was whether the defendants...

Payment to sub-contractor – TDS u/s 194C – It is a case of one advertising agency getting work done from the other advertising agency i.e. a sub-contractor -...

The Calcutta High Court considered the applicability of a moratorium order from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in India, focusing on principles of Comity of Nations and...

The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

Suit decreed partially for recovery, doctrine of lis pendens applied. Agreement dated 17.08.1990 not found fraudulent or result of collusion between plaintiff and...

This case deals with the issue of granting bail in a case involving forgery, creation of fake GST firms, and related economic offenses. The key points are: The court...

Dishonor of Cheque - he trial court is empowered to direct payment of compensation, double that amount. Rs. 7,02,500/- is the fine imposed in the case on hand and the...

Quick Updates: