Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2016 Year 2016 This

Levy of penalty under Rule 25 of CER, 2002 – issuing invoices ...


Penalties for Invoices Without Goods u/r 25 and Section 11AC Unwarranted; Appellant Not Dealing with Excisable Goods.

August 4, 2016

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Levy of penalty under Rule 25 of CER, 2002 – issuing invoices without accompanying the goods - appellant not dealt with the excisable goods at all. The penalties on the appellant under Rule 25 of the Central Excise rules, 2002 read with section 11AC of the Act are not warranted. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty personal penalty on Broker u/r 26 of CER - abetment in availment of inadmissible CENVAT Credit - From the statements it has been proved beyond any doubt...

  2. Penalty for false invoice - Section 55(2) AP VAT Act states that any VAT dealer, who issues a false tax invoice or receives and uses a tax invoice, knowing it to be...

  3. The appellants have issued invoices without payment of duty and issue of invoice without payment of duty is contravention of provision of Cenvat Credit Rules - Levy of...

  4. Levy of penalty u/r 25 of CER - Penalty on Registered Dealers, Unregistered Dealers and Transporters - Availment of fraudulent credit - issuance of Cenvatable invoices...

  5. The case involved the determination of penalty u/s 69(1)(k) of the J&K Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for the issuance of 35 improper invoices on the same day. The High Court...

  6. Appellant have knowingly availed the credit only on the invoice without receipt of the goods therefore no case was made out for waiver of penalty - penalty upheld.

  7. Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

  8. Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on Managing Director. Appellant challenged Order upholding penalty without...

  9. Clandestine removal - Invoices pink coloured [Duplicate for transporter] are found in factory, hence, it can also be inferred logically that goods were not transported...

  10. The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

  11. Seeking grant of Bail - bogus transactions fake invoices - receipt of purchase invoices in the name of fake firms without physical receipt of goods and issuing sale...

  12. Imposition of penalty u/r 25 of CER - Second stage Dealer - Violation in respect of issuing Invoice - proper invoices were not issued and consequently, there is...

  13. Reversal of CENVAT Credit - removal of capital goods as such - power plant - Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - The sale of goods or transfer of ownership of the...

  14. Seeking grant of anticipatory bail - passing huge amount of inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC) in fraudulent manner by the way of issuing bogus invoices without supply...

  15. Excisable goods - even though the product in this case is marketable, it does not answer to the question of ‘excisable goods’ as, practically there can be no levy of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates