Whatever may be the reason for confirming part of the amount in ...

Taxpayers can challenge penalties under Income Tax Act Section 271(1)(c) even if part of the assessment is confirmed.

October 25, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Whatever may be the reason for confirming part of the amount in assessment, the same does not automatically lead of levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c). Assessee can question the addition itself in penalty proceedings so as to justify non-levy of penalty. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Whatever may be the reason for confirming part of the amount in ...

Taxpayers can challenge penalties under Income Tax Act Section 271(1)(c) even if part of the assessment is confirmed.

October 25, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Challenge to penalty order u/s 129(1) of CGST Act for non-generation of Part-B of E-way bill. Petitioner accepted notice and paid Rs. 11,08,150 penalty voluntarily...

Interest u/s 234B - The term “assessed tax” has been defined in Explanation-1 of Section 234B (1). As per said Explanation-1 “assessed tax” means the tax on the total...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - The bonafide or other wise malafide of non compliance is also required to be kept in mind. The tax and interest are statutory levies,...

The appellant trust claimed to be formed for public charitable activities and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act 1959, regularly filing its income tax...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure on the part of legal heir of the deceased assessee to explain the source of part of the deposits - The mere failure on the part of the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) where the validity of assessment order itself is in doubt - Assessment u/s 153A questioned on approval Granted u/s 153D -...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Quick Updates: