Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2016 Year 2016 This

Revision u/s 263 - an order prejudicial and erroneous to the ...


CIT Lacks Jurisdiction for Revision: Assessment Order Must Be Both Prejudicial and Erroneous u/s 263 of Income Tax Act.

October 27, 2016

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - an order prejudicial and erroneous to the revenue - though the order passed by the A.O. is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue but it is not erroneous, therefore, the CIT cannot assume jurisdiction to revise the assessment order passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  2. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - As both the issues in question on the basis of which the Pr.CIT had assumed jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act had been considered and decided in...

  3. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  4. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - the assessee had duly explained as to why certain receipts though subjected to TDS, would not be liable to be offered to tax such as...

  5. Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

  6. Revision u/s 263 - For the purpose of exercising jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act, the conclusion that the order of the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of...

  7. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Jurisdiction exercised by ld PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. PCIT has selected the item (share capital and...

  8. The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

  9. u/s 263, the AO had not made any addition regarding cash deposits in the assessee company's bank account and unsecured loan received during the year under consideration,...

  10. Revision u/s 263 - When the provision contained under Section 92CA(4) of the Act makes it mandatory upon the Assessing Officer to compute the total income of the...

  11. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - We find that the assessment order qua the deduction under section 80(9)(2)(d) of the Act on account of interest earned from Surat Co-operative...

  12. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Applicability of Higher rate of tax u/s 115BBE on surrendered income - The applicability of the amended provision of section 115BBE of the Act,...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - Exemption claimed u/s 80 IB(11- C) - If certain assessment order was made by the Income Tax Officer the same could not be branded as erroneous by the...

  14. Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

  15. The ITAT Rajkot dealt with a case involving revision u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act regarding orders u/s 92CA. The amendment to section 263 clarified the jurisdiction to...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates