Revision u/s 263 - an order prejudicial and erroneous to the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 27, 2016

Revision u/s 263 - an order prejudicial and erroneous to the revenue - though the order passed by the A.O. is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue but it is not erroneous, therefore, the CIT cannot assume jurisdiction to revise the assessment order passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - an order prejudicial and erroneous to the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 27, 2016

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - An incorrect assumption of the fact or an incorrect application of law will satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous. The phrase...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

Revision u/s 263 - The expression prejudicial to the interest of the revenue is of wide import and is not confined to merely loss of tax. - The term erroneous means a...

Revision u/s 263 - valuation of closing stock, non increasing of closing stock by proportionate other direct expenses - The alleged under valuation of closing stock is a...

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - An order which is prejudicial to revenue even if no Tax Loss - The High Court found that the AO's assessment did not adequately address...

The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the main allegation was the non-disclosure of agricultural income affecting the deduction u/s 54B. The...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

The AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interests. The filing fee for increasing share capital was rightly allowed as revenue expenditure,...

AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - profit attribution of a fixed place PE and the DAPE - Erroneous but not prejudicial to revenue order - Even if that computation of profit...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous or prejudicial of revenue - AO allowed the Exemption u/s. 10(34) - Insurance business - Dividend income - The order passed by the AO...

Exemption granted on Invalid F-Form – Invocation of revision jurisdiction – KGST - If there was error resulting in revenue losing tax, it would be prejudicial to...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - AO has deemed it fit and proper to treat the cash deposits as the business receipts of the...

Quick Updates: