Home Highlights November 2016 Year 2016 This

You may also like:

1. Refund of Service Tax - input services used for export of goods - service tax paid by MIAPL is under category which was not classified under Notification 17/2009-ST -...

2. Refund of service tax on taxable services used for export of goods – assessee claimed refund of service tax on taxable services used for export of MT of Chrome...

3. Refund of Service Tax claimed on inputs services – Export of goods - Exemption under Notification No.17/2009-ST requires clear classification of input services - Error...

4. Claim of refund - SEZ unit - Notification No. 09/2009-ST and 17/2011-ST - mere supply of surplus power in DTA as mentioned in Rule 47 of SEZ Rules, cannot be construed...

5. Refund of service tax - developer unit in SEZ - claim of refund prior to the exemption notifications no 9/2009-ST issued - refund allowed - AT

6. As per notification No. 17/2009-ST, specific category of services of service provided under section 65(105)(zzb) of the Finance Act, 1994 are only eligible for refund....

7. Refund of service tax - input services - port services - The rejection of refund claim is with respect to Service Tax paid on Port Services and not Customs House Agent...

8. Refund claim - rejection on the ground that at the time of export of goods, the appellant was entitled for the benefit of exemption N/N. 17/2008-ST dated 01.04.2008...

9. Refund of claim - Claim filed beyond period of 1 year - Export - Notification No. 17/2009 - all conditions are mandatory - refund claim filed beyond one year rejected - AT

10. Denial of Refund claim - Exemption claim - services availed by SEZ unit - Since the appellant had paid the duty, no reasoning has been given by the first appellate...

11. CENVAT Credit - The Department contended that since exemption was available under Notification No.17/2009 for these services, the appellant should have opted for the...

12. Claim of refund rejected on the ground that according to the Clause 2(f) of Notification No.17/2009-ST, dt.7.7.09 - AT

13. Refund claim - Notification No.17/2009 - it is clear that receipt submitted by the courier agency does not content the details as required under the notification -...

14. Refund claim - Notification No. 41/2007-ST and 17/2009-ST - the condition of non claiming of drawback was prevailing during the relevant period therefore, the appellant...

15. Refund claim rejected by adjudicating authority on grounds that services provided by appellant to SOLCIL did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST...