Register Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes
TMI - e-Newsletter     TaxTMI    Income-tax Rules Amended: Form 3CD Gets Major...     TaxTMI    SCN Issued Two Days Beyond Section 73(2) Deadline...     TaxTMI    CBIC Revises Tariff Values Under Section 14(2) for...     TaxTMI    Diamond Imprest Authorisation Form Updated with...     TaxTMI    Sea Cargo Manifest Regulations: CBIC Extends...     TaxTMI    CBIC Implements Electronic Processing for Personal...     TaxTMI    CBDT Authorizes Waiver of Interest on Delayed...     TaxTMI    GST Assessment Order Set Aside for Lacking Document...     TaxTMI    SEBI Introduces New Governance Rules for High Value...     TaxTMI    Government exempts Bengal gram from AIDC and SWS...     TaxTMI    CGST Rules Amended: Rule 164 Changes Affect Tax...     TaxTMI    SEBI Eases ESG Compliance: New Green Credit...     TaxTMI    CBIC Clarifies Section 128A Waiver Eligibility for...     TaxTMI    Transfer of Development Rights Constitutes...     TaxTMI    GST Fraud Mastermind Denied Bail Under Sections...     TaxTMI    Latest Case-Laws     TaxTMI    Latest Notifications + Circulars     TaxTMI    GST Council Decisions     TaxTMI       Right Stop
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2016 Year 2016 This

Refund claimed of the amount paid twice, due to non-receipt of ...


Refund Approved for Double Payment Due to Missing Challans; Claim Justified and Allowed.

December 19, 2016

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

Refund claimed of the amount paid twice, due to non-receipt of challans - whether refund claim justified? - Refund allowed - AT

View Source

 

← Previous Next →

 

You may also like:

  1. CESTAT allowed refund of customs duty paid twice through customs broker for same import consignment. Appellant demonstrated through Bill of Entry, payment challans, and...

  2. Claim of refund amount on account of double-payment of Customs Duty

  3. The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

  4. The case pertains to the refund claims of service tax paid under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) due to a misconception or mistake of law. The tribunal held that...

  5. CESTAT allowed appeal regarding refund of erroneously paid excise duty on imported SKO. Appellant substantiated claim through PLA records, TR-6 challans, invoices, and...

  6. The CBIC circular enabled electronic voluntary self-initiated payments on ICEGATE e-Payment platform to replace manual TR-6 challan payments. Users registered on ICEGATE...

  7. Refund of excess tax paid - The refund claim under 11B was rejected by the Original Authority on the ground that the claim cannot be modified by the appellant to include...

  8. Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

  9. CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that refund claim for service tax under section 65 of Finance Act, 1994 was not time-barred as the relevant date for refund claim was the date of...

  10. The High Court held that the Execution Application filed by the Applicant against the Respondent does not survive due to the approved Resolution Plan under the...

  11. Refund of the service tax - Double payment of service tax - appellant have made first payment when there was no liability for them to pay - Period of limitation not...

  12. Refund claim - Period of limitation - Double Taxation - The respondent had also paid tax on the same invoices. - The petitioner sought direction for the refund of Input...

  13. Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

  14. Refund claim - The decision of ITC Limited is not applicable to the present facts and circumstances of the case as at the time of filing of Bills of Entry, the appellant...

  15. Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: Principal Must Pay GST on Materials Sent to Absconding Job Worker Unde...
F: GST Payment Made via DRC-03 Without Filing DRC-03A: Procedural Lapse o...
F: Input Tax Credit Available for Technical Services Used in Foreign Busi...
C: Investment Advisers and Research Analysts Can Now Collect Advance Fees...
H: Insolvency Professionals Must Use Baanknet Platform for Liquidation Sa...
H: SEBI Extends Timeline for Retail Algorithmic Trading Standards to Augu...
F: Input Tax Credit on Guest House Rent: Navigating Section 17(5) Restric...
F: Superintendent's Authority to Issue DRC-07 Summary When Original Deman...
F: Soil Purchase for Resale: Can Dispatch Challans Replace Proper Invoice...
F: GST Audits Have No Time Limitation Under Section 65, Unlike Show Cause...
A: Mandatory GSTR-1 Filing: Reporting Outward Supplies Under GST With 15 ...
A: Filing OPC Annual Returns: 180-Day Deadline, Required Forms, and Commo...
A: Deodorant Sprays vs. Traditional Attars: Why Natural Indian Perfumes O...
A: Low-Quality Chinese Imports Harm Indian Industries: Solutions Include ...
A: Comprehensive Export Risk Management: Strategies for Political, Econom...
A: India's Pharmaceutical Industry Seeks to Reduce Dependence on Chinese ...
A: Proposed U.S. Tariffs on Indian Pharmaceuticals Could Raise Drug Price...
A: Saharanpur Wooden Craftsmanship: Traditional Artistry Supporting Artis...
A: Preserving Cultural Heritage: How Mithila Paintings Support Women Arti...
A: Mughal-Inspired Mirzapur Rugs: Preserving Traditional Craftsmanship Wh...
H: GST Orders Uploaded Without Proper Service Violate Natural Justice, Co...
H: GST Time Extension During COVID-19: Court Defers Ruling on Section 168...
H: Bail denied for mastermind accused of Rs. 53.03 Crore GST fraud throug...
H: Lufthansa Wins Challenge Against Withholding Tax Rate Change Under Ind...
H: Section 54F Deduction Denied: Timing of House Purchase and Constructio...
H: Tax Relief: Exchange of Old Flat for New in Redevelopment Not Taxable ...
H: Interest on Rupee-Denominated CCDs Must Be Benchmarked Against Domesti...
H: Assessee in Power Business Denied Enhanced 35% Depreciation Under Sect...
H: Taxpayer's Appeal Succeeds as Cash from Selling Deceased Wife's Jewelr...
H: Quantitative Restrictions on LAM Coke Imports Valid Under Section 9A o...