Processing of refund claim under DVAT - Revenue's contention ...

Court Rules Timely DVAT Refunds Must Adhere to Section 38(3) Timelines, Rejects Revenue's Argument on Sections 11(2) & Rule 12.

January 25, 2017

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Processing of refund claim under DVAT - Revenue's contention that the mandate of Sections 11(2) of the DVAT Act and Rule 12 of the CST Rules, overriding all other concerns and suspending as it were, the obligation to frame the assessments and process refunds within the timeframe prescribed u/s 38(3) is misplaced and rejected as unacceptable - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Processing of refund claim under DVAT - Revenue's contention ...

Court Rules Timely DVAT Refunds Must Adhere to Section 38(3) Timelines, Rejects Revenue's Argument on Sections 11(2) & Rule 12.

January 25, 2017

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Valuation of imported goods - Admittedly, it is evident on the face of the record that deductive value was available before the Court below which have not been rejected...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

The High Court dismissed the Revenue's petition challenging the order of the Single Judge. The court held that u/s 18(3) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and...

The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal concerning disallowance of exemption under s.10(23C)(vi). The Tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that the AO failed to...

The court held that the assessee was entitled to refund of Rs. 3,50,00,000/- deposited with the department, along with statutory interest and interest on refunds. The...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Rejection of refund claim - refund claim application was not filed electronically - This Court rejected the similar stand taken by the learned counsel for Revenue and...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

Refund of input service Credit - transitional provision under Section 142(3) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 11-B of Central Excise Act,...

The High Court considered a case involving refund of accumulated credit due to inverted tax structure u/s 54(3) Proviso and Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules. The court held that...

HC ruled in favor of the appellant regarding customs duty refund claims from 2014-2015. While initial refunds were granted, subsequent litigation reached SC, which...

Order - DVAT Rules, 2005 - Extension of time limit prescribed in sub-rule (4) of Rule 26 - Cir. No. F.3(277)/Policy/VAT/2012/30-40 Dated: April 19, 2012

Quick Updates: