Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of expenses of ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Levied as Revenue Accepts Assessee's Explanation on Travel Expenses Disallowance.

February 1, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of expenses of foreign Travel expenses and inter city travel expenses - Revenue has not rejected the explanation of the assessee and merely levied the penalty on the basis that the expenses are for non-business purposes - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of expenses of ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Levied as Revenue Accepts Assessee's Explanation on Travel Expenses Disallowance.

February 1, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the matter travelled to the Tribunal, the explanation which was given by the assessee and accepted by the CIT(A) was once again examined by...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction claimed u/s 80IA - there being no factual basis for establishing that the expenses needed to be allocated and the expenses so...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee has explained the entries with necessary evidences and said explanation is not found to be false, then merely for the reason...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - loan from friends and relatives for financing his son’s USA visa - when the evidences and explanation furnished in support of cash credits are...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) involved an addition based on estimation by the Assessing Officer, which was later re-estimated by the CIT(A) to disallow 10% of the...

Quick Updates: