Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2017 Year 2017 This

Detention of goods with vehicle - subsequently order of ...


Court Questions Justification for Detaining Goods and Vehicle After Prior Attachment of Rs. 1.60 Crore Worth Goods.

March 30, 2017

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Detention of goods with vehicle - subsequently order of attachment was passed - is detention justified? - the department has already attached other goods worth ₹ 1.60 crores, lying in the petitioner's godown. Additional attachment of the consignment of the goods in question therefore would not be necessary. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank accounts u/s 83(1) of the CGST/DGST Act. The court held that the...

  2. Income Tax: Limit of remuneration to working partners in partnership firms allowed as deduction increased - on first Rs 6,00,000 of book profit or loss, Rs 3,00,000 or...

  3. HC ruled bank accounts constitute "property" subject to provisional attachment under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act. The term "any property" in Section 281B(1)...

  4. Seeking release of detained goods and vehicle - generation of second E-way bill - The action of the GST officers in seizing the goods in question is evidently an act of...

  5. Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - Having regard to the fact that goods and vehicle are lying stationed/detained with the respondent No.2 since 11.03.2021;...

  6. Attachment of Bank Account - Orders passed u/s 83(1) of the CGST Act - Period of limitation - The court acknowledges the statutory provision cited by the petitioner,...

  7. Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

  8. Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than...

  9. Jurisdiction - detention of goods alongwith vehicle - 1st respondent as the “prescribed authority” under section 67 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 was...

  10. Seeking grant of release of detained goods - import of Lithium Ion Cell - Compliance of BIS marking - There is no justification whatsoever on the part of the...

  11. HC ruled on tax settlement scheme interpretation regarding admitted versus disputed tax amounts. Settlement Officer erroneously deducted pre-deposit from disputed amount...

  12. Monetary limit for appeal to the High Court - The appeal involves a total sum of Rs. 60 lakhs, consisting of the redemption fine and penalty. Citing Instructions dated...

  13. Non-issuance of a proper Show Cause Notice u/s 73(1) of the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (AGST Act) prior to passing the impugned order u/s 73(9) violates...

  14. Provisional release of detained goods - The department's insistence on a 100% bank guarantee of Rs. 25,00,000/- was deemed arbitrary and onerous, especially considering...

  15. The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates