Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-appearance on six occasions on ...

Assessee Penalized Rs. 20,000 for Non-Compliance with Section 142(1) Notices; Initial Penalty Reduced from Rs. 60,000.

April 3, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-appearance on six occasions on notices issues u/s 142(1) - assessee is liable to pay ₹ 20,000/- as penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Act as against ₹ 60,000/- imposed by the ld. Assessing Officer. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-appearance on six occasions on ...

Assessee Penalized Rs. 20,000 for Non-Compliance with Section 142(1) Notices; Initial Penalty Reduced from Rs. 60,000.

April 3, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent...

Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

Levying penalty u/s 272A(1) - non-compliance of the notice - Nonappearance of the assessee in response to the initial notice under section 142(1) of the Act was not...

CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Penalty imposed u/s 271A - Failure to maintain books of accounts - no income from business or profession received by the assessee which exceeds Rs.1,20,000/-. Therefore,...

SC upheld the Tribunal's compensation award in a motor accident death claim, restoring Rs. 58,24,000/- for father and Rs. 93,61,000/- for mother against claimed amounts...

Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than...

Applicability of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) provisions to a non-resident bank and its CEO. The bank was charged with contravening sections 64(2), 6(4),...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Capital gain computation - Fair Market Value as on 01.04.1981 u/s 55(2)(b)(i) - the fair market value of the impugned immovable property should be adopted at Rs....

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

The Appellate Tribunal held that for determining the holding period of a property or calculating long-term capital gains, the date of allotment of the property is...

Quick Updates: