Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2017 Year 2017 This

Clandestine removal - Preponderance of probability is in favor ...


Appellants' Lack of Transparency Fails to Overturn Revenue's Case on Clandestine Removal Offense.

April 10, 2017

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Clandestine removal - Preponderance of probability is in favor of Revenue when appellants failed to come out with clean hands. Although appellant tried that investigation should be in dark to unearth the offence committed, they failed since self-speaking evidence came up in the course of investigation - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Clandestine removal - on the basis of third party records - As Revenue has failed to produce any supporting evidence in their favour, therefore, the charge of...

  2. Clandestine removal and under valuation - private records - presumption - The Revenue has miserably failed to produce corroboration evidence on records so as to...

  3. Clandestine removal - Invoices pink coloured [Duplicate for transporter] are found in factory, hence, it can also be inferred logically that goods were not transported...

  4. 100% EOU - Clandestine removal - case of the department is on the ground that deemed export clearance were not genuine and were shown only on paper - The entire case of...

  5. Clandestine removal - consumption of electricity - the charge of clandestine removal is to be established on examination of facts of each case and not merely on the...

  6. The allegation of clandestine removal has been established by the Revenue against the appellant. While the onus is on the Revenue to establish clandestine removal, they...

  7. Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

  8. Clandestine Removal - Ingots - the charges levelled against the appellants for clandestine manufacture and removal of final products, without payment of duty are not...

  9. The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

  10. The CESTAT set aside the demand and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine removal, holding that the charge was not substantiated by sufficient evidence....

  11. Clandestine Removal - documents seized by the investigating team from the residence of the Accountant - corroborative evidence or not - The charge of clandestine removal...

  12. Clandestine removal - penalty has rightly been imposed on the appellants for their collaborative role in the conspiracy of clandestine removal of goods by M/s HSAL and...

  13. Clandestine removal of goods – For clandestine removal of finished goods, personal penalties are required to be imposed upon the Director and vice President of the main...

  14. Clandestine removal - The department relied on statements, diaries, and records, which the appellants contested, citing coercion and lack of corroboration. The Tribunal...

  15. Clandestine removal - CENVAT credit Demand - Penalty - shortage of goods - Mere signing of the chart alleging removal of finished goods cannot be treated as clear...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates