Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2017 Year 2017 This

Valuation - According to the Revenue, while clearing the ...


Revenue Allegation Dismissed: Authority Rejects Claims of Underreported Clearance Value and Duty Discrepancies Based on Verification Report.

June 9, 2017

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Valuation - According to the Revenue, while clearing the rejected slag, they were showing less clearance value and paying less duty on that, and the reversal/payment of duty was not equal to the credit availed by them - Once adjudicating authority dropped the demand on the basis of verification report, revenue cannot take the different stand - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Customs officials claim to have received illicit gratification - Clearance of restricted goods without following proper procedures - improper finalization of provisional...

  2. Cheating - allegation is that the petitioner had given a false statement before the Revenue Authorities - The best allegation against the petitioner is that he...

  3. Claim of rebate/refund - export of goods from DTA unit to SEZ units - initially applicant cleared excisable goods without payment of duty under UT-I Bond to the SEZ Unit...

  4. The NCLAT dismissed appellants' attempt to submit belated claims after a resolution plan had already been approved by both the CoC and Adjudicating Authority. The...

  5. Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

  6. Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

  7. The petitioners' rebate claim for export of goods was rejected and penalty imposed u/s 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rules 25 and 27 of the Central...

  8. Rejection of claims which are delayed - When an Application under Section 7 cannot be entertained for a debt, which is barred by time and is liable to be rejected, any...

  9. The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

  10. Extended period of limitation - Revenue Neutrality - Clandestine Removal - In case of clandestine clearance against the delivery memo there could be no claim of CENVAT...

  11. Claim of appellant rejected on the ground that Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC - right to claim consideration of claim again in third round - NOIDA’s status...

  12. The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal concerning disallowance of exemption under s.10(23C)(vi). The Tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that the AO failed to...

  13. Income from house properties OR business income - By simply sitting in the office, AO just assigned the reason that I don’t agree with your submission. - the ld.Revenue...

  14. The assessee failed to file the original return of income, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings for underreporting income. The assessee's authorized...

  15. Clandestine removal - evasion of duty - clearance of branded Khaini - burden to prove on Revenue - Ultimately, the High court concurred with the majority view of the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates