Once the company has admitted the undervaluation and has paid ...

Case Laws Customs

June 23, 2017

Once the company has admitted the undervaluation and has paid the penalty, the appellant who is the Director of the company and also looking after the affairs of the company is equally responsible and therefore imposing the penalty on the appellant is absolutely lawful.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Once the company has admitted the undervaluation and has paid ...

Case Laws Customs

June 23, 2017

You may also like:

Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Directors in the company - There is no specific averment in the complaint to the effect that the petitioners who are all the...

Removal of Director - The Petitioner cannot plead ignorance about the affairs of Company till 2018 when he is alleged to have verified the MCA to know the affairs of...

Dishonor of Cheque - person responsible for day to day affairs of the company - In the facts of the present case, the only averment in the complaint is that the...

Dishonor of Cheque - it is crystal clear that vicarious liability under sub section 1 or 2 of section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be fastened if the person...

Dishonour of Cheque - Vicarious liability of the Company Secretary - The CS was never a Director of the Accused Company - In-charge of the day-to-day affairs of the...

- Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director - The Petitioner resigned from the Company on 05.02.2016. Therefore, as per the details regarding the Directors of...

Investigation into the affairs of the appellant company - The matter is only at the stage of investigation and otherwise also the appellant company has not been able to...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Power of CLB to decide the issue of salary - Passing directions regarding the employees of the Company is an interim arrangement regarding...

Conversion of partly up equity shares into fully paid-up equity shares - the board of directors are well within the powers to make a call on the shareholders in respect...

The case involves an offence under FEMA with regard to the business conduct of a company. The liability of a director for contravention of provisions depends on their...

Court ordered dissolution of company and discharged Official Liquidator as Liquidator u/s 481 of Companies Act, 1956 as Official Liquidator could not proceed further...

Validity of order of NCLT admitting the application for CIRP - Although, pendency of winding-up petition before the High Court may not preclude filing of Section 7...

Dishonor of cheque - vicarious liability - On perusal of the notice and the complaint, it is seen that there is no specific averments against the petitioners who had...

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of the director - appellant was in-charge of day-to-day affairs of the Company or not - The appellant argued against her...

Levy of GST - salary paid to Director of the company who is paid salary as per contract - Reverse charge mechanism (RCM) - the services rendered by the Director to the...

Quick Updates: