Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2018 Year 2018 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - on account of survey, if the assessee ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

January 5, 2018

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - on account of survey, if the assessee has offered additional income, it cannot be a ground to impose penalty under section 271(1)(c) unless Assessing Officer is able to strictly proved that the income offered by the assessee is either concealed or filed in accurate particulars of income - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - There cannot be a penalty merely on the basis that the assessee has disclosed income after receiving the notice from the ADIT and the income was...

  4. Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

  5. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  6. This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

  7. Penalty u/s 271AAB/271(1)(c) - cash was seized u/s 132A - the discrepancies were found during the survey - Obviously, no penalty can be imposed unless the conditions...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

  9. Rental income determination - assessee jointly owns 50% house property in Singapore with wife - offered 100% rental income for AY 2014-15 erroneously, rectified in...

  10. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - the revenue may be technically correct in not considering the later return of income as a revised return but it cannot be denied that additional...

  12. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of the notice issued under Section 142(1) - if the assessee really had no connection with the Swiss Bank accounts,...

  13. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

  14. Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

  15. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disclosure of additional income consequent to survey operation - the explanations of the assessee that he has declared additional income...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates