Register Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes
Income Tax Bill, 2025     TaxTMI    TMI - e-Newsletter     TaxTMI    Government Securities Trading Rules Modified Under...     TaxTMI    Finance Ministry Revises AIDC Rates: Bourbon...     TaxTMI    Partnership Firm Wins Appeal Delay Condonation...     TaxTMI    Tax Department Must Share Documents Requested by...     TaxTMI    Input Tax Credit Denied: Taxpayers Failed to Prove...     TaxTMI    Input Tax Credit Utilization From Different GST...     TaxTMI    DGFT Makes Electronic Certificates of Origin...     TaxTMI    Central Government Sets Phased Implementation Dates...     TaxTMI    RBI Revises Payment Rules Between ACU Member...     TaxTMI    Stock Exchanges Must Take Full Responsibility for...     TaxTMI    SEBI Makes Intermediaries Fully Liable for AI...     TaxTMI    New Income Tax Bill Proposes Single Tax Year...     TaxTMI    Assessment Order Under Section 73 of GST Act...     TaxTMI    Revenue Appeals Below Rs. 2 Crores Must Be...     TaxTMI    Legal Heirs Must Pay Compensation in Cheque Bounce...     TaxTMI    Latest Case-Laws     TaxTMI    Latest Notifications + Circulars     TaxTMI    GST Council Decisions     TaxTMI       Right Stop
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2012 Year 2012 This

ST - Whether the penalty imposable under the Finance Act, 1994 ...


High Court Rules Penalties Under Finance Act, 1994, Are Not Automatic; Specific Circumstances Required for Service Tax Violations.

June 5, 2012

Case Laws     Service Tax     HC

ST - Whether the penalty imposable under the Finance Act, 1994 is automatic – Held no - HC

View Source

 

← Previous Next →

 

You may also like:

  1. Whether levy of penalty u/S 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is automatic – Imposition of penalty is not automatic. - HC

  2. CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

  3. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  4. Penalty u/s 271 - Defective notice - the allegation should be specific and clear in the penalty notice also because the assessee has to submit reply in the course of...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of penalty proceedings u/s 270A due to the failure to specify relevant clauses. It was held that the penalty proceedings...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for denying deduction u/s 80DD for a disabled person with over 80% disability. The assessee, a retired individual, had submitted...

  7. Assessee failed to justify receipt discrepancy between ITR and Form 26AS, AO made addition considering it as fees for technical services and imposed penalty u/s 270A for...

  8. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) is one such consequence, saved of course u/s. 273B on proving a reasonable cause, which is a reiteration of the principle that though a strict...

  9. Penalty order passed u/s 271AAA - disclosure of undisclosed jewellery and cash - The levy of penalty in not automatic and not mandatory. - considering the facts...

  10. FDI - Automatic route or not - Inward remittances made into India in the year 2008, through normal banking channels - bidding of IPL - The present case cannot be...

  11. Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

  12. Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - The words may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty in section 271 leave a certain amount of discretion in imposition of penalty...

  13. AO imposed penalty under s.270A for unsubstantiated business expenses including advertising, development, land, and excavation charges, which were disallowed from...

  14. Classification of imported goods - LC PUFA Mix Oil with Sofinol (edible grade) - whether to be classified under CTH 15079010 or CTH 15179090 - importer misclassified...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - maximum penalty @ 300% - Defective notice - non specification of any specific limb or clause - AO has conclusively held in the penalty order that...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: Participant Questions Legality of Single SCN for Two Years Under Secti...
F: Business Challenges ITC Reversal Due to Supplier's GST Non-Payment, Ci...
F: GST Registration Required for Reverse Charge on Goods Transport Servic...
F: Debate on GST's Applicability to Stamp Duty: Exemption Under SI. No 47...
H: GST Council Clarifies Rates: 5% on Pepper, Tax-Free Raisins, Different...
H: Exim Bank's $120M Credit Line to GO-VNM for High-Speed Guard Boats und...
H: Export-Import Bank's $180M Credit Line for Offshore Patrol Vessels Mus...
H: Gold Bullion Import Quota: New Rules for TRQ Allocation Require Certif...
H: DGFT Sets Import Quotas: 0.8 MT Calcined 1.9 MT Raw Petroleum Coke for...
H: Government Securities Trading Rules Modified Under Section 16 to Contr...
H: Finance Ministry Revises AIDC Rates: Bourbon Whiskey at 50%, Other Alc...
H: Private Companies Get Extended Deadline Until June 30, 2025 For Securi...
A: Section 10AA: Tax Exemptions for Companies in SEZs Boost Export Income...
A: Supreme Court orders insurance company to settle truck fire claim, val...
A: Court Quashes Penalty for Wrong Tax Head Credit Allocation; Electronic...
A: Uttar Pradesh Launches E-HRMS Portal for State Employees: Streamlined ...
A: Retrospective GST Cancellations Risk Halting Business Operations; Cour...
A: Filing Complaints on Misleading Food Labels: Understanding the Process...
A: Telangana High Court Validates Extension of Limitation Period for Show...
A: Global Shift to Ban Harmful Food Additives: Health, Safety, and Enviro...
A: E-commerce operators must pay GST liabilities via cash ledger under Se...
A: Indian Customs Cuts Port Dwell Time with Direct Port Delivery, Faceles...
F: Debate on Time-Barred Appeals Post FORM GST APL-02 Issuance Under Sect...
H: Small Retailer Gets Final Chance to Restore GST Registration by Filing...
H: GST Refund Claim Rejection Invalid: Authority Must Give Reasoned Order...
H: Tax Reassessment Under Section 147 Invalid When No Material Facts Were...
H: Tax Authorities Must Re-examine Trading Results and Form 26AS Discrepa...
H: Taxpayer's Section 10(26AAA) Sikkimese Exemption Claim Remanded for Fr...
H: Property Transaction Additions Under Section 69A Deleted Due to Bankin...
H: Assessment Order Under Section 56(1)(vii) For Rs. 139.67 Crores Quashe...