Reopening of assessment - Assessing Officer framed the impugned ...

Assessing Officer's 16-Day Order Violates Assessee's Right; 4-Week Legal Remedy Period Required After Objection Rejection.

September 3, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Reopening of assessment - Assessing Officer framed the impugned order within 16 days of disposing of the objections of the assessee - AO should have allowed four weeks’ time to the assessee to seek their legal remedies after rejection of the objections of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment - Assessing Officer framed the impugned ...

Assessing Officer's 16-Day Order Violates Assessee's Right; 4-Week Legal Remedy Period Required After Objection Rejection.

September 3, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - non issuance of valid notice u/s 143(2) - transfer of case u/s 127 - Legislative intent becomes clear with reading to Section 127(3)...

The High Court set aside the impugned assessment order that disallowed Input Tax Credit solely on the ground of delay u/s 16(4) of the GST Acts. The Court directed the...

The HC quashed the attachment of the petitioner's banking account, following precedent established in Sri Ganapathi Pandi Industries (2024). The Court determined that...

HC quashed assessment order concerning Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims under GST regime. The matter involved interpretation of limitation periods under Section 16(4) and...

HC quashed order relating to Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims that were time-barred under Section 16(4) of CGST Act but fell within limitation under Section 16(5)....

Section 16(4) of the CGST Act imposes a time limit for claiming input tax credit (ITC), restricting it to the due date of filing the return for September following the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Rejection of objections of the assessee - The stance of the Assessing Officer leads this Court to prima facie believe that the...

The High Court set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) u/s 16(4) of the GST Act due to a discrepancy between the e-way...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

Restriction availing on Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act (CGST Act) 2017 - Sub-section (4) of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

The assessment order passed u/s 144C(3) was beyond the prescribed period of one month from the end of the month in which the period for filing objections u/s 144C(2)...

Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Period of limitation u/s 16(4) - After the decision of Supreme Court in the case of Northern Opertaing Systems, the Petitioner discharged IGST...

TP Adjustment - Interest on trade receivables - there was no agreement provided by the assessee to show that there was an agreement between the assessee and its AE...

The assessee objected to the valuation report prepared by the district valuation officer and the stamp duty rate. The assessing officer referred the matter to the...

Quick Updates: