Anti-Profiteering - benefit of reduction in the rate of GST in ...

Restaurant Service Not Profiteering: Price Hike Due to Input Tax Credit Denial u/s 171 of CGST Act, 2017.

September 29, 2018

Case Laws GST NAPA

Anti-Profiteering - benefit of reduction in the rate of GST in restaurant service - purchase of 6 Hara Bhara Kabab Sub - base price of the product increased from ₹ 130/- to ₹ 145/- when the GST was reduced from 18% to 5% - Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017. - Due to denial of ITC, the cost of the product increased - It is not a case of profiteering.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Anti-Profiteering - benefit of reduction in the rate of GST in ...

Restaurant Service Not Profiteering: Price Hike Due to Input Tax Credit Denial u/s 171 of CGST Act, 2017.

September 29, 2018

Case Laws GST NAPA

You may also like:

Profiteering - Restaurant Services - benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on - contravention of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 -...

The Central Government, based on recommendations from the Goods and Services Tax Council, will cease accepting requests from the Competition Commission of India or...

Profiteering - restaurant service supplied by the Respondent - the GST rate of 5% has been charged w.e.f. 15.11.2017 however the base prices of 170 products have been...

The case involves eligibility of CENVAT Credit on input services for output services including short-term accommodation, restaurant, rent-a-cab, and consultancy services....

Profiteering - purchase of Stayfree Sanitary Napkins - allegation is that reduction in the rate of Input Tax Credit has not been passed y commensurate reduction of the...

Profiteering - restaurant service - reduction in rate of GST - every recipient/ customer is entitled to the benefit of the tax rate reduction by way of reduced prices...

Electronic commerce operators (ECOs) required to pay tax u/s 9(5) of CGST Act for specified services supplied through their platform are not required to reverse...

Profiteering - restaurant service - the Respondent had increased the base prices of different items by more than 7.39% i.e. by more than what was required to offset the...

CENVAT Credit - input service - non-payment of service tax on Ocean Freight - non-payment of service tax on Government Fees under RCM - The Appellate Tribunal considered...

Profiteering - supply of restaurant service - The Respondent was legally not required to collect the excess GST and therefore, he has not only violated the provisions of...

Profiteering - purchase of fiats - it is alleged that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on to the Applicant No. 1 and Applicant No, 2 by way of...

Profiteering - benefit of additional input tax credit had not been passed on to the home buyers or not - period from July 2017 to September, 2020 - As project was...

Cenvat Credit - Input services - export of goods - CHA service - rent-a-cab service - credit allowed - AT

Respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema ticket prices above Rs. 100 during 01.01.2019 to...

CENVAT Credit - The input service credit cannot be denied on the ground that it is shown in the ER1 return instead of the ST3 returns since the cross utilization of...

Quick Updates: