Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2018 Year 2018 This

Liability of service tax - Chit transaction - The legislature ...


Finance Act 2015 Amendment: Chit Transactions Now Taxable; Refunds Allowed If No Unjust Enrichment Occurs.

October 17, 2018

Case Laws     Service Tax     HC

Liability of service tax - Chit transaction - The legislature felt the need for inclusion of the transactions within the fold of service and hence amended the Finance Act, 1994 by Finance Act, 2015. As a corollary it has to be understood that it was not taxable prior to the amendment. - Refund to be allowed, subject to unjust enrichment.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

  2. Refund of service tax paid - Chit Fund Foreman Service - refund claimed as no service tax was chargeable - There has been a delay of more than two years - refund cannot be allowed.

  3. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

  4. Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

  5. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

  6. Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

  7. Refund - when the iron ore was exported on payment of duty on FOB value, the refund of excess customs duty paid does not attract bar of unjust enrichment - refund allowed.

  8. The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

  9. Refund of education cess - export - rebate of duty - amendment is prospective or retrospective – held that amendment is retrospective in nature - refund of education...

  10. Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

  11. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - case of respondent-assessee is that at the stage of payment of refund, which is already sanctioned, the issue of unjust enrichment is...

  12. The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

  13. CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

  14. Denial of refund claim - Finalization of provisional assessment - prior to the amendment i.e. 13-7-2006, this doctrine of unjust enrichment was not attracted to refund...

  15. Refund claim - Provisional assessment - Unjust enrichment - claim of refund was not subjected to the condition which was brought in by way of amendment for the first...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates