Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2018 Year 2018 This

Clandestine removal - cross-examination of persons whose ...


Adjudicating Authority Must Examine Witnesses Before Using Statements in Central Excise Cases u/s 9D.

November 6, 2018

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Clandestine removal - cross-examination of persons whose statements were relied upon - As per Section 9D, the provisions are clear that, before relying on the statement of witness, it is essential on the part of the Adjudicating Authority to first examine the witness and then only such statement can be relied upon.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

  2. CENVAT Credit - availing credit without physically receiving and using the said goods in their factory - It is well settled law that statements recorded by the Central...

  3. The HC held that u/s 9D(1)(a) of the Excise Act, statements recorded by the Gazetted Central Excise Officer during investigation cannot be used against the assessee...

  4. Clandestine removal - In the light of sanctity of section 9D of Central Excise Act, 1994, the outcome of the notices can rest squarely on statements that comply thereon...

  5. Clandestine Removal - As per the provisions of section 9D it is clear that during adjudication, the adjudicating authority is required to first examine the witness in...

  6. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

  7. Clandestine removal - reliance on statement of the workers/ employees - Any statement recorded under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act could be admitted in evidence...

  8. Recovery of CENVAT Credit alongwith interest and penalty - second stage dealers were issuing invoices without actually supplying goods - Examining the records of each of...

  9. This case pertains to an alleged offense under FEMA involving bogus purported exports with inflated invoices to obtain export benefits, where the goods never reached the...

  10. Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

  11. Smuggling - Reliability of uncorroborated statement of co-accused - Section 9D is pari materia to Section 138B of Customs Act 1962 and hence the ratio of the above said...

  12. Clandestine manufacture and removal - relevancy of statements u/s 9D in the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Both sides agreed that the procedure under section 9D has not been...

  13. Principles of natural justice (audi alterem partem) - whether the adjudicating authority was right in refusing an opportunity of cross-examination of natural persons...

  14. Revised monetary limits for adjudication of show cause notices in Central Excise for commodities classified under Chapter 24 of Schedule IV (tobacco and tobacco...

  15. Valuation - Reliance on the statement made before the customs officers - recording of statement u/s 108 - Certainly a statement recorded under duress or coercion cannot...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates