Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2019 Year 2019 This

Disallowance of obsolete store and spares - AO, treat the same ...


Assessing Officer Misclassifies Obsolete Stores as Capital Expenditure, Disallowing Section 42 Deductions for Taxpayer.

March 16, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Disallowance of obsolete store and spares - AO, treat the same as capital expenditure and did not constitute stock-in-trade and deduction u/s 42 could be allowed to the assessee for capital expenditure as and when the same are certified by the Auditors - it can't be treated as capital expenditure for the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Deduction u/s.35 AD(5)(aa) - whole of capital expenditure incurred for purpose of development of hotel claimed - We restore the issue to file of the Assessing Officer...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of the reassessment notice issued u/s 148 and the consequent order passed u/s 147 regarding the addition made by the...

  3. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

  4. Nature of expenditure - Disallowance of repair and maintenance charges - The assessee has taken a plea that no new asset is created or no benefit of enduring nature has...

  5. Nature of expenditure - expenditure towards purchase of software - We hold that advantage of an enduring benefit, need not be on capital account. If the advantage...

  6. Nature of expenses - expenditure incurred on capital stores and spares - replacement of spares in the machineries - The ITAT the expenditure incurred cannot be treated...

  7. In the present case, the Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the expenditure claimed u/s 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act on an ad-hoc basis. The AO did not challenge the...

  8. The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

  9. Capital expenditure or revenue expenditure - the expenditure incurred in regaining this profit company unit is in the nature of a capital expenditure and not the revenue...

  10. The assessee's reconciliation explained total purchases, including capital goods and purchase returns, tallying with recorded purchases. The Tribunal correctly held that...

  11. Expenditure towards acquiring and oping of retail outlets / stores - Operations of these stores at various locations is one composite business and once business had been...

  12. Revenue or capital expenditure - current repairs u/s 31 - overhead expenditure on construction - deductionallowed - AT

  13. The key issue relates to the classification of the cost of silt as capital or revenue expenditure. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated it as capital expenditure and...

  14. Deduction u/s 35(2AB) for in-house Research and Development (R&D) expenses was disallowed as the assessee failed to properly explain the basis of claim and reconcile the...

  15. Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates