Punishment of “Compulsory Retirement” - conduct led to ...

Court Rules Compulsory Retirement Punishment Unjustified Without Evidence in Customs Act Misconduct Case.

April 23, 2019

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

Punishment of “Compulsory Retirement” - conduct led to conviction - criminal charge under Customs Act, 1962 - where a charge is levelled and incumbent held guilty of misconduct without adducing any evidence, such order of punishment cannot be sustained.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Punishment of “Compulsory Retirement” - conduct led to ...

Court Rules Compulsory Retirement Punishment Unjustified Without Evidence in Customs Act Misconduct Case.

April 23, 2019

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

Bogus sundry creditors - Whether CIT(A) had clearly violated the provisions of Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, while admitting additional evidence? - The High...

National Financial Reporting Authority Amendment Rules, 2022 - Punishment in case of non-compliance - Notification

Compulsory / premature retirement - Doubting integrity and expressing discontent about the functioning of the Petitioner - The petitioner herein has been given fair...

Disciplinary proceeding against the govt officer - Punishment of withholding of 10% of monthly pension for a period of three years - misconduct - failure to maintain...

The applicant sought regular bail for allegedly illegally claiming Input Tax Credit (ITC) through fake firms without conducting any business or supply of goods,...

Dishonour of Cheque - Rule of evidence - acquittal of accused - Proof of liability - service of demand notice - The High court concluded that the complainant had...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

Valuation of goods - old and used self-propelled platform supply vessel Sagar Fortune - The justification offered for invoking rule 12 of Customs Valuation...

The trial court erroneously invoked the presumption u/s 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, without considering the contradictions in the evidence of the...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

This is a case involving the cancellation of a petitioner's GST registration by the respondent authorities. The court held that Section 16(2)(c) and Rule 86B of the GST...

The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

Quick Updates: