Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2019 Year 2019 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Revised Return surrendering the amounts ...


Penalty Deleted: Lack of Inquiry Invalidates Concealment Claims u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.

May 4, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Revised Return surrendering the amounts as income - coercion of the authorities in survey - assessee furnished a plausible explanation, which required an investigation and inquiry - without holding any inquiry finding of guilty animus or concealment of income could not have been rendered by the AO - penalty deleted

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

  2. Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

  3. Penalty for concealment of income u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act - Claim of capital loss as bad debt - bonafide belief - no penalty - HC

  4. Penalty for concealment of income Under Section 271(1) (c) - Article

  5. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

  6. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished...

  8. Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  10. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act to be deleted. The Assessing Officer...

  11. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  12. This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

  14. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates