Oppression and Mismanagement - Once franchise agreement is ...

Case Laws Companies Law

June 13, 2019

Oppression and Mismanagement - Once franchise agreement is terminated it will be unreasonable restriction on the part that one party will be restrained not to do anything which is similar to the appellant company, especially when no consideration has flown from appellant company - the right of the persons to use the word “Ex-Director” cannot be denied as it would represent their experience as well - it is not oppression

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and Mismanagement - Once franchise agreement is ...

Case Laws Companies Law

June 13, 2019

You may also like:

Oppression and mismanagement - appellant has no inherent right to continue as Managing Director/Director in the 1st respondent unless he is able to carry the majority...

Franchise Service – manufacturing activity - Merely because words 'franchise' and 'franchisee' have been used in agreement does not ipso facto mean that as per that...

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Oppression and mismanagement - misappropriation of funds - as such no irregularities were found in convening an Extra-Ordinary General Meeting which was requisitioned at...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Violation of the Status quo order - This Tribunal comes to a resultant conclusion that while passing of status quo order it should be...

Oppression and mismanagement - the Tribunal has the power to make Interim Orders which it thinks fit for regulation of the conduct of the affairs of the Company -...

Oppression and Mismanagement - This ‘Tribunal’ keeping in mind of the ingredients of Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 comes to a resultant conclusion that...

Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

Oppression and Mismanagement - the impugned order is a nonspeaking order. The question of Oppression, and Mismanagement, Maintainability and Limitation in the present...

Continuation of petition for Oppression and Mismanagement by the legal heir of deceased petitioner - the son can hardly maintain the company petition which is filed by...

Oppression and mismanagement - not permitted/given sufficient opportunity to be involved in the affairs/board meetings - allotment of shares at par without premium to...

Oppression and mismanagement - Theft of documents - use of (such) documents in judicial proceedings is to substantiate their case namely, “oppression and mismanagement”...

Maintainability of petition before NCLT - oppression and mismanagement - contentions in application u/s 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and the contentions in...

Quick Updates: